search for: koder

...can't compile libguestfs from sources: make libguestfs-1.12.7 leads to: ......... CC libguestfs_la-virt.lo In file included from virt.c:38:0: guestfs.h:1737:51: error: unknown type name 'virDomainPtr' make[3]: *** [libguestfs_la-virt.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/koder/tmp/libguestfs-1.12.7/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/koder/tmp/libguestfs-1.12.7/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/koder/tmp/libguestfs-1.12.7' make: *** [all] Error 2 make libguestfs-1.13.21 leads to: .....

...+0000 Modify: 2014-05-06 21:46:39.450449491 +0000 Change: 2014-05-06 21:46:39.450449491 +0000 Birth: - # selinuxenabled ; echo $? 1 # kvm-ok INFO: /dev/kvm exists KVM acceleration can be used on host system - $ docker -v Docker version 0.9.1, build 3600720 Thanks ---- Kostiantyn Danilov aka koder.ua Principal software engineer, Mirantis skype:koder.ua http://koder-ua.blogspot.com/ http://mirantis.com

...ntal=F, onefile=F, width=4, height=4, family="Arial") plot(1:10, 1:10) dev.off() which resulted in: Error in postscript("testArial.eps", horizontal = F, onefile = F, width = 4, : Failed to initialise default PostScript font The *.afm files were downloaded from http://www.koders.com/, since I wasn't able to run ttf2afm or ttf2pt1 on my computer. The files are saved under ../R/library/grDevices/afm. I have also tried saving the files with LF line endings (instead of CRLF) as indicated in README under /grDevices/afm, and zipping them. That didn't make a difference....

Hi, I''d like to know if there is any way to develop an entire rails app in iPad. Maybe with an app, maybe with an online platform as Cloud9. I''d like to know what you think. Thank you, Rodrigo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hi, Does anyone know a practical way to determine the number of 20ms speex frames in a given speex packet without actually looping on speex_decode* ? Cheers, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080208/0a3e84ac/attachment.html

...d in iaxclient and asterisk in the speex codec modules. I've also written about it to this list (probably with code excerpts). Google is your friend. http://mlblog.osdir.com/audio.compression.speex.devel/2006-01/index.shtml Someone's even ported it to Java, it seems, here: http://www.koders.com/java/fidAEF1846C82020C9EDC1E49EF2C3F2663BC99A242.aspx -SteveK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080208/96296708/attachment.html

...nd am trying to retrieve tuples. I have one attribute that has datatype ''number(1)''. I found that ActiveRecord maps this attribute to boolean. So it gets a class of either FalseClass or TrueClass. I tried to find the source of the problem and I found oracle_adapter.rb (http:// www.koders.com/ruby/fidAF6400E299159A198A4064173CF305C895FCA945.aspx?s=%22Michael+Schoen%22#L5) has a method ''simplified_field'' that has a line "return :boolean if OracleAdapter.emulate_booleans && field_type == ''NUMBER(1)''". I tried overriding this metho...

I have hacked a script that I found at http://www.koders.com/ruby into a generalized webrick startup script. The script is attached to this post and the help text is reproduced below. "script/server" runs webrick on port 3000 bound to 0.0.0.0. If that is too general then you can pass a specific port using -p= or --port=. "script/serve...

>From time to time people request symbolic computations beyond what D() and deriv() etc can provide. A brief look at the internet shows that there are many more or less developed computer algebra packages freely available. Therefore, I wondered if it would be an idea to try to 'integrate' one of these packages in R, which I guess can be done in more or less elegant ways... I do not know

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8

Hi All, Can someone please help? I''ve been banging my head against for wall for 2 months; all of which has been spent trying to set up ROR. So I actually haven''t written 1 line of code :( Any help would be greatly appreciated :) I''m following the 4th edition of "Agile Web Development with Rails". So, I''m able to deploy the site via WEBrick.