search for: kocher

...n Asterisk Server. The Avaya has 3 CO Ports available. I thought buying a TDM30B card with 3 FXS ports to connect the * to the Avaya CO Ports. Is this the right approach? Does any one have experience with such a configuration? Thanks in advance for all recommandations and suggestions.... Daniel Kocher

...IGUSR1) improvements: * relative paths may also be reopened, there''s a small chance this will break with a handful of setups, but unlikely. This should make configuration easier especially since the "working_directory" configurator directive exists. Brought up by Matthew Kocher: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.unicorn.general/900 * workers will just die (and restart) if log reopening fails for any reason (including user error). This is to workaround the issue reported by Emmanuel Gomez: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.unicorn.general/90...

..., so nothing worked. ( I assumend this context is only necessary for calls from zaptel, not to it) This may be a bug: in the verbose log I found nothing like "[chan_zap] Could not initialize ..., due to ....", this had helped alot and had saved alot of hours (-; /sebastian Pascal C. Kocher wrote: >Hello > >Make sure you run ztcfg only once(!) per reboot. A second time seems to >kill the zaphfc module (even if it doesn't state an error) > >Do you have any wcfx* cards running? > >Best regards, >Pascal. > > > >>-----Urspr?ngliche Nachrich...

...nction foo at: spectre.c:18:6 As it runs after inlining it must be ran at –O1 or above (recommendation is to run it at –O2). It's also enabled in the LTO pipeline so can detect cases of cross module inlining with -flto. The code is on phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43643 Paul Kocher (one of the researchers who wrote the Spectre paper) recently had a look at Microsoft’s /Qspectre flag: https://www.paulkocher.com/doc/MicrosoftCompilerSpectreMitigation.html Out of 15 examples Microsoft’s compiler was able to detect 2 (admittedly some of the examples are very hard to detect...

...aviour of the X11 forwarding changed significantly, it is much slower. See below the truss output (server side which runs 3.7.1p2) an check for the timestamp (6 seconds delay). Do you have any idea what may causes this behaviour? Platform is Solaris 5.9 Generic_117171-05. Thanks in advance, Andy Kocher 19279: 9.5463 sigaction(SIGCLD, 0x00000000, 0xFFBFF1C0) = 0 19279: 9.5464 sigaction(SIGCLD, 0xFFBFF140, 0x00000000) = 0 19279: 9.5464 pipe() = 4 [5] 19279: 9.5465 fcntl(4, F_SETFD, 0x00000001) = 0 19279: 9.5465 fcn...

...t branches to this address. This training is done from the attacker’s address space, and it does not matter what resides at the gadget address in the attacker’s address space; all that is required is that the branch used for training branches to use the same destination virtual address." [1] Kocher et.al.: Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution https://spectreattack.com/spectre.pdf Best Regards, Paul > E.g. if the code looks like this, then a branch funnel basically turns > into a standard type 1 pattern AFAICT: > > struct Base { >     virtual int f(long) = 0;...

Wouldn't a branch funnel open the door to a type 1 attack? E.g. if the code looks like this, then a branch funnel basically turns into a standard type 1 pattern AFAICT: struct Base { virtual int f(long) = 0; }; struct A : Base { int f(long x) override { return 0; }; }; struct B : Base { int f(long x) override { // As in listing 1 in

The proposed mitigation for variant 2 of CVE-2017-5715, “branch target injection”, is to send all indirect branches through an instruction sequence known as a retpoline. Because the purpose of a retpoline is to prevent attacker-controlled speculation, we also end up losing the benefits of benign speculation, which can lead to a measurable loss of performance. We can regain some of those benefits

Hello list We're trying to get a HFC card running in NT mode. Zaphfc loads fine as module and ztcfg -v is run only once per reboot. Cabling is ok, the ISDN-TE gets ist power fine. The HFC card does not share any interupts. After the TE picks up the console (pri debug enabled) shows: Nov 21 18:42:20 NOTICE[13326]: chan_zap.c:7169 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: 6 on Primary D-channel of span 1