search for: kocak

Hello. We have a webserver using FreeBSD, we read about tunning kern.ipc.somaxconn (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kernel-limits.html) so the OS can handle all the connections. Is there a way to know how many connections are established in a certain moment?. I know about netstat(1) but is there any other command that we can use to know the exact amount of

I've scoured the archives but have found no concrete answer to my question. Problem: Two data sets 1st data set(x) = 20,000 rows 2nd data set(y) = 5,000 rows Both have the same column names, the column of interest to me is a variable called strain. For example, a strain named "Chab1405" appears in x 150 times and in y 25 times... strain "Chab1999" only appears 200

dfhfsdhf at ghghgr.com I ran a simple lme model: modelrandom=lmer(y~ (1|Test) + (1|strain), data=tempsub) Extracted the BLUPs: blups=ranef(modelrandom)[1] Even wrote myself a nice .csv file....: write.csv(ranef(modelrandom)[1],paste(x,"BLUPs.CSV")) This all works great. I end up with a .csv file with the names of my strains in the first column and the BLUP in the second

So i have a simple function: bmass=function(y){ weight=y$WT*y$MSTR return(bio) } And want to apply to a whole bunch of rows in my data.frame: final1=apply(final,1,yldbu) BUT...recieve the following error: "Error in y$WT : $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors" However when i try: > final[1,]$WT*final[1,]$MSTR [1] 156.3 It gives me the correct answer....what is apply not

Hello, I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes. It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the laptop. I guess there is a switch already prsent to have in the bootloader config? Thanks, oh -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

On 12/4/13, 9:05 AM, Mark Felder said: ----------------- > There was no alternative; we couldn't keep BIND in base. BIND 9 will > certainly have a EoL before the EoL of FreeBSD 10.x, and we can't use > BIND 10 because it requires importing Python to base. I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that we should have a minimal Python in "base". More and more people

Hello.... Trying to apply a model to each level of a factor For example, i have three levels of a variable I call 'Code'...I want to model the data under each level of code differently...I've attached a sample data set... http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3913431/data.txt data.txt I.E for code 0HY0 I want to model y~ 1|strain + 1|code *both code and strain are random effects...