Displaying 20 results from an estimated 237 matches for "kobject".
Did you mean:
object
2023 Mar 20
1
[RESEND, PATCH v2 01/10] kobject: introduce kobject_del_and_put()
There are plenty of using kobject_del() and kobject_put() together
in the kernel tree. This patch wraps these two calls in a single helper.
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com>
---
v2:
-add kobject_del_and_put() users
resend patchset to gregkh, Rafael and Damien
include/linux/kobject.h | 1 +
lib/kobject.c...
2023 Mar 22
3
[PATCH v3 01/10] kobject: introduce kobject_del_and_put()
There are plenty of using kobject_del() and kobject_put() together
in the kernel tree. This patch wraps these two calls in a single helper.
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com>
---
v3:
-convert to inline helper
v2:
-add kobject_del_and_put() users
include/linux/kobject.h | 13 +++++++++++++
lib/kobject.c...
2013 Oct 09
1
[PATCH] kobject: show debug info on delayed kobject release
Useful for locating buggy drivers on kernel oops.
It may add dozens of new lines to boot dmesg. DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is
hopefully only enabled in debug kernels (like maybe the Fedora rawhide
one, or at developers), so being a bit more verbose is likely ok.
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <...
2019 Sep 23
2
[PATCH 2/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...'struct device' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
int mdev_set_iommu_device(struct device *dev, struct device *iommu_device);
^~~~~~
>> include/linux/mdev.h:62:27: warning: 'struct kobject' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
int (*create)(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev);
^~~~~~~
>> include/linux/mdev.h:69:19: error: field 'attr' has incomplete type
s...
2019 Sep 23
2
[PATCH 2/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...'struct device' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
int mdev_set_iommu_device(struct device *dev, struct device *iommu_device);
^~~~~~
>> include/linux/mdev.h:62:27: warning: 'struct kobject' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
int (*create)(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev);
^~~~~~~
>> include/linux/mdev.h:69:19: error: field 'attr' has incomplete type
s...
2008 Feb 13
2
[PATCH] btrfs: fixes for kobject changes in mainline
Here's a patch against the unstable tree that gets the code to build
against Linus's current tree (2.6.24-git12). This is needed as the
kobject/kset api has changed there.
I tried to make the smallest changes needed, and it builds and loads
successfully, but I don't have a btrfs volume anywhere (yet) to try to
see if things still work properly :)
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
Note, I can remove a lot m...
2014 Mar 19
1
[PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth configurable
Couple more bikesheddy things:
Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)?
Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too
BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms)
My brain of little size gets confused by the
BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) +
vs
BUILD_BUG_ON(foo);
as it just seems like more text for the same content.
Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't understand?
2014 Mar 19
1
[PATCH] virtio-blk: make the queue depth configurable
Couple more bikesheddy things:
Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)?
Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too
BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms)
My brain of little size gets confused by the
BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) +
vs
BUILD_BUG_ON(foo);
as it just seems like more text for the same content.
Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't understand?
2019 Sep 23
0
[PATCH 2/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...vice' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
> int mdev_set_iommu_device(struct device *dev, struct device *iommu_device);
> ^~~~~~
> >> include/linux/mdev.h:62:27: warning: 'struct kobject' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
> int (*create)(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev);
> ^~~~~~~
> >> include/linux/mdev.h:69:19: error: field 'attr' has incompl...
2019 Oct 23
2
[PATCH V5 1/6] mdev: class id support
...===================
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 343d79c1cb7e..6420f0dbd31b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> dev_name(mdev_dev(mdev)));
> ret = 0;
>
> + mdev_set_class(mdev, MDEV_CLASS_ID_VFIO);
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> index f0d71ab77c50..cf2c013...
2019 Oct 23
2
[PATCH V5 1/6] mdev: class id support
...===================
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 343d79c1cb7e..6420f0dbd31b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> dev_name(mdev_dev(mdev)));
> ret = 0;
>
> + mdev_set_class(mdev, MDEV_CLASS_ID_VFIO);
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> index f0d71ab77c50..cf2c013...
2019 Oct 11
0
[PATCH V3 1/7] mdev: class id support
...==========================================
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 343d79c1cb7e..17e9d4634c84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
dev_name(mdev_dev(mdev)));
ret = 0;
+ mdev_set_class(mdev, MDEV_ID_VFIO);
out:
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index f0d71ab77c50..b5d223882c6c 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c...
2019 Sep 24
3
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...e <linux/nospec.h>
> @@ -643,6 +644,8 @@ static void kvmgt_put_vfio_device(void *vgpu)
> vfio_device_put(((struct intel_vgpu *)vgpu)->vdev.vfio_device);
> }
>
> +static struct vfio_mdev_device_ops intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops;
> +
> static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> {
> struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = NULL;
> @@ -679,6 +682,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> ret = 0;
>
> mdev_set_class_id(mdev, MDEV_ID_VFIO);
> + mdev_set_dev_ops(mdev, &intel_vfio_vg...
2019 Sep 24
3
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...e <linux/nospec.h>
> @@ -643,6 +644,8 @@ static void kvmgt_put_vfio_device(void *vgpu)
> vfio_device_put(((struct intel_vgpu *)vgpu)->vdev.vfio_device);
> }
>
> +static struct vfio_mdev_device_ops intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops;
> +
> static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> {
> struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = NULL;
> @@ -679,6 +682,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> ret = 0;
>
> mdev_set_class_id(mdev, MDEV_ID_VFIO);
> + mdev_set_dev_ops(mdev, &intel_vfio_vg...
2023 Mar 20
1
[PATCH v2, RESEND 01/10] kobject: introduce kobject_del_and_put()
Hi all,
Out of consideration for minimizing disruption, I did not send the
patchset to everyone. However, it seems that my consideration was
unnecessary, so I CC'd everyone on the first patch. If you would
like to see the entire patchset, you can access it at this address.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230319092641.41917-1-frank.li at vivo.com/
Thx,
Yangtao
2023 Mar 20
1
[PATCH v2, RESEND 01/10] kobject: introduce kobject_del_and_put()
On 3/20/23 12:34, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Out of consideration for minimizing disruption, I did not send the
> patchset to everyone. However, it seems that my consideration was
> unnecessary, so I CC'd everyone on the first patch. If you would
> like to see the entire patchset, you can access it at this address.
>
>
2023 Mar 20
1
[PATCH v2, RESEND 01/10] kobject: introduce kobject_del_and_put()
Hi filesystem maintainers,
> Hard to comment on patches with this. It is only 10 patches. So send everything please.
If you are interested in the entire patchset besides Damien,
please let me know. I'll resend the email later to cc more people.
Thx,
Yangtao
2019 Sep 24
1
[PATCH V2 2/8] mdev: class id support
...the documentation.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 23aa3e50cbf8..f793252a3d2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> dev_name(mdev_dev(mdev)));
> ret = 0;
>
> + mdev_set_class_id(mdev, MDEV_ID_VFIO);
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> index f0d71ab77c50..d258ef1fed...
2019 Nov 04
1
[PATCH V7 1/6] mdev: class id support
...===================
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 343d79c1cb7e..6420f0dbd31b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> dev_name(mdev_dev(mdev)));
> ret = 0;
>
> + mdev_set_class(mdev, MDEV_CLASS_ID_VFIO);
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> index f0d71ab77c50..cf2c013...
2019 Sep 24
0
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...<linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/nospec.h>
@@ -643,6 +644,8 @@ static void kvmgt_put_vfio_device(void *vgpu)
vfio_device_put(((struct intel_vgpu *)vgpu)->vdev.vfio_device);
}
+static struct vfio_mdev_device_ops intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops;
+
static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
{
struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = NULL;
@@ -679,6 +682,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
ret = 0;
mdev_set_class_id(mdev, MDEV_ID_VFIO);
+ mdev_set_dev_ops(mdev, &intel_vfio_vgpu_dev_ops);
out:
return ret;
}...