search for: knwoledge

...ion for Fortran/DragonEGG experts: >> >> Why Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast (void (...)* >> @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind" ? Why it needs >> bitcast? > Just a wild guess (basing from my llvm-gcc knwoledge though): there is > a bug with in gcc fortran frontend where it fails to create the > function TREEs with proper types. It might easily be possible that > e.g. call of function with type with no args is performed with some > amount of args, etc. It's pretty fine in gcc, but not in L...

...s is probably a question for Fortran/DragonEGG experts: > > Why Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast (void (...)* > @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind" ? Why it needs > bitcast? Just a wild guess (basing from my llvm-gcc knwoledge though): there is a bug with in gcc fortran frontend where it fails to create the function TREEs with proper types. It might easily be possible that e.g. call of function with type with no args is performed with some amount of args, etc. It's pretty fine in gcc, but not in LLVM, the latter is m...

...rts: > > > > > > Why Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast > > > (void (...)* @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind" > > > ? Why it needs bitcast? > > Just a wild guess (basing from my llvm-gcc knwoledge though): there is > > a bug with in gcc fortran frontend where it fails to create the > > function TREEs with proper types. It might easily be possible that > > e.g. call of function with type with no args is performed with some > > amount of args, etc. It's pretty fine...

Dear LLVM, This is probably a question for Fortran/DragonEGG experts: Why Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast (void (...)* @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind" ? Why it needs bitcast? I'm expecting something like "call void @_gfortran_flush_i4(i8* null)". Otherwise, we will need to teach our call parsers to digg

...gt;>> >>>> Why Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast >>>> (void (...)* @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind" >>>> ? Why it needs bitcast? >>> Just a wild guess (basing from my llvm-gcc knwoledge though): there is >>> a bug with in gcc fortran frontend where it fails to create the >>> function TREEs with proper types. It might easily be possible that >>> e.g. call of function with type with no args is performed with some >>> amount of args, etc. It's...

...(c4.bin) but the only one i was able to find is this: ftp://ftp.in-berlin.de/pub/capi4linux/firmware/c4/3-11-04 i cannot say if this one is ok or something other should be found & installed then i apt-got capi utils to have capiinit and capiinfo; you need capiinit to install firmware; using my knwoledge, the only way to have /usr/lib/isdn/c4.bin is installling suse 9, but this is not my last wish at teh moment this is my /etc/isdn/capi.conf: c4 /usr/sbin/c4.bin DSS1 - - - - capiinit now start c4 with no complain; in /etc/asterisk/capi.conf i have: [g...

After almost 40 hours of work and testing over 6 computers I have finally figured out the answer to my problem of Roaming profiles not updating. This has occurred with SAMBA versions 2.2.* and later up through and including 3.0.2a (completely clean install in each case, including rebuilding domain, users and groups and smb.conf from scratch). It does not appear to be a SAMBA issue but one

...Fortran's "call flush()" is converted to "call void bitcast >>>>> (void (...)* @_gfortran_flush_i4 to void (i8*)*)(i8* null) nounwind" >>>>> ? Why it needs bitcast? >>>>> >>>> Just a wild guess (basing from my llvm-gcc knwoledge though): there is >>>> a bug with in gcc fortran frontend where it fails to create the >>>> function TREEs with proper types. It might easily be possible that >>>> e.g. call of function with type with no args is performed with some >>>> amount of args...