search for: knfsd

Hi - if I have a doubly patched kernel (2.4.5) (1) Apply gkernel/CVS ext3 patches (2) Apply Neil Brown/Reiserfs team knfsd and reiserfs patches Will ext3 be exportable by knfsd (i.e. inherit automagically the nfsd_operations thingies from ext2) or does it need further patching? -- Chan Shih-Ping (Richard) <cshihpin@dso.org.sg> DSO National Laboratories 20 Science Park Drive Singapore 118230

This is prompted by two issues: Neil Brown on the NFS list asking for file systems that users want to export via NFS and the problems that the other journaling filesystem reiserfs has with knfsd. As far as I understand reiserfs does not work with knfsd so a patch is needed for the fs driver to provide a callback to knfsd to allow the fs driver to do some clever tricks with inodes. Neil's patch also modifies ext2 so that it provides this callback thingy (<---this is my very limited...

...ck(2795) lock failed at offset 1073741735 count 20 op 6 type 1 (Resource temporarily un available) [2000/04/19 10:52:34, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 4288 cmd=36 (SMBlockingX) eclass=1 ecode=33 I think this is the interesting bit. Some details: linux-2.2.14 SMP with knfsd compiled into the kernel RedHat-6.1 knfsd-1.4.7-7 knfsd-clients-1.4.7-7 samba-2.0.6-19991110.i386.rpm nfslock run at boot time from initscripts [root@osmin /root]# egrep -i lock /etc/smb.conf # Disable opportunistic locking to prevent our PCs from cacheing files locally oplocks = False # opl...

...ak-in. Version 0.1.9.1 of the nfs-utils package corrects the problem. Although there is no known exploit for the flaw in rpc.statd, Red Hat urges all users running rpc.statd to upgrade to the new nfs-utils package. Users should note that in Red Hat Linux 6.0 and 6.1 the rpc.statd daemon was in the knfsd-clients package. The nfs-utils package replaces both the knfsd and knfsd-clients packages shipped in Red Hat Linux 6.0 and 6.1. On systems running a kernel older than 2.2.16-3, users should also take this opportunity to upgrade to the latest kernel release. 4. Solution: For each RPM for your pa...

...eforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/archives//nfs/> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:10:35 +1100 (EST) Status: O Content-Length: 1608 Lines: 41 On Monday January 29, radtke@conectiva.com wrote: > Andreas Dilger wrote: > > > I've been using knfsd on ext3 (2.2.17 kernel) for quite some time without > > problems. However, this is the older NFS code, and not the major changes > > that went into NFS for 2.2.18, so YMMV. > > I'm using NFS with 2.2.19pre7 + ext3 without any problems yet, quite stable. Ofcourse, "appa...

...9;m waffling between resierfs and ext3. I've read the ext3 page and some of the mailing list archives but have a few questions remaining. (I apologize in advance if they are redundant.) Are there any known issues with: - LVM - LVM snapshots (more on that in a sec) - Software RAID 5 - knfsd (including NFS v.3 support) The hardware will be a vanilla Pentium III with a bunch of IDE drives. I think that ext3 support for LVM snapshots is still in the works... I'm okay with not using them until they work, but would still like to plan ahead and put the filesystem on an LVM volume now....

Hi, We have encountered another funny with ext3 on 2.4. Like the kernel NFS server, we have a routine in InterMezzo that does something like looking up an inode by inode number. (compare intermezzo's presto_ilookup or knfsd's nfsfh_iget) Effectively both of these routines do ilookup() { inode = iget(sb, ino) if (inode->i_nlink==0) iput(inode); .... } We find that this oopses if the file is recently deleted: echo foo > file rm file "ilookup file" oopses. We suspect that iget g...

Are there any issues with ext3-2.4-0.0.7 on 2.4.6-pre5? The patch applies with offsets and no rejects. [I need the export reiserfs by knfsd functionality of -pre3 onwards. My intent for the test system is to protect all standard partitions /, /usr, /var with ext3 (easier to revert to ext2 and do OS upgrades) and try a mixture of ext3 and reiserfs for exporting of data and user home partitions.] Cheers! -- Chan Shih-Ping (Richard)...

Hello, I have a problem with smbmount between two Linux (both: RH 6.0, kernel 2.2.9, samba 2.0.4c) boxes. When I use smbmount, the share loads and I can read files just fine, but when I copy ("cp file") to the share, the first 512 bytes of the file are copied and then the copy just freezes there. Trying several times to kill -9 the process didn't work. I had to reboot the server.

I'm trying to NFS mount an export of a SMB mounted share: Windows Box -> Linux Box -> Solaris Box Windows Share -> Linux SMB Mounted/Exported as NFS -> Solaris NFS mount \\windows\share -> /mnt/windows/share -> /mnt/windows/share The problem is that I get a "permission denied" when attempting to mount the exported file

...way/gtepub98.xlw [2000/03/22 15:00:30, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 3701 cmd=7 (SMBmv) eclass=1 ecode=183 Does this ring a bell with anyone? Is it relevant that this shared volume is not local to the samba server but rather mounted over a 100BaseT NFS backbone? (using knfsd and nfslock as implemented in kernel 2.2.13ac2 and redhat-6.1 userspace)?? I know I had a devil of a time until I got NFS locking up and flying. Thanks for any hints . . . I've tried almost ever combination of oplocks, no oplocks, lev2 oplocks etc, with no apparent joy. It's to the poin...

...e code they write, submit, and gets plugged into the kernel is not flawless and more than likely could be improved for security reasons. 4) To provide an operating system to the public. I want to see a linux where the sysadmin doesn't have to watch his back all the time in fear of say some new knfsd exploit or a way to fork()bomb his/her router via a simple mistake in buffer.c 5) To provide a safe linux to the end-user.. Linux is slowly but surely becoming a choice for the desktop user. Most of these users are walking into linux with no knowledge of what potential dangers lie at their finger...

On 2/6/2017 10:40 ??, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: > Reverting to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7 solves the problem for me Thank you very much Philippe, I notice that I have upgraded to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7_3.x86_64 on May 26. Have you checked if this bug/behavior has been reported or should we file a bug report? Nick

....net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/archives//nfs/> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:40:27 -0700 (MST) Status: O Content-Length: 1941 Lines: 44 Neil Brown writes: > I haven't looked at ext3 or played with it but in order for a > filesystem to work with knfsd (in it's current form) it must: Neil, I sent Stephen a patch to update ext3 with the same changes that went into ext2 2.2.17 and 2.2.18, which include your NFS changes. > Support the read_inode super_operation and > 1/ recognise if the inode number refers to a currently active ino...

...-------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: A buffer overflow exists in the user space NFS daemon that shipped with Red Hat Linux 4.2 and 5.2. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Linux 4.x, all platforms Red Hat Linux 5.x, all platforms Red Hat Linux 6.x uses the knfsd kernel space NFS daemon, and is not affected by this problem. 3. Problem description: The length of a path name was not checked on the removal of a directory. If a long enough directory name was created, the buffer holding the pathname would overflow, and the possibility exists that arbitrary cod...

...tcp transport module. Sep 22 11:03:21 hesperia1 kernel: RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module. Sep 22 11:03:21 hesperia1 systemd-udevd: starting version 219 Sep 22 11:03:21 hesperia1 systemd: Started Configure read-only root support. Sep 22 11:03:21 hesperia1 kernel: Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir at monad.swb.de). Sep 22 11:03:21 hesperia1 systemd: Mounted NFSD configuration filesystem. ... Sep 22 11:03:27 hesperia1 systemd: Mounting /mnt/dd2500-1... Sep 22 11:03:27 hesperia1 systemd: Starting Notify NFS peers of a restart... Sep 22 11:03:27 hesperia1 sm-notify[948...

...find module 'blktap' Oct 9 02:03:05 kvmxen-centos7-test1-nb systemd: Started Apply Kernel Variables. Oct 9 02:03:05 kvmxen-centos7-test1-nb systemd: systemd-modules-load.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Oct 9 02:03:05 kvmxen-centos7-test1-nb kernel: Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir@monad.swb.de). Oct 9 02:03:05 kvmxen-centos7-test1-nb systemd: Failed to start Load Kernel Modules. Oct 9 02:03:05 kvmxen-centos7-test1-nb systemd: Unit systemd-modules-load.service entered failed state. 3. oxenstored Oct 9 02:03:12 kvmxen-centos7-test1-nb xencommons:...

At 19:28 29/06/00 +1000, you wrote: >a customer asked me about the difference between using Samba and NFS. AFAIK The answers are roughly the following: The difference between Samba and NFS is primarily that Samba uses the SMB (aka Lanmanager) protocol which is considered "standard" for PCs (Windows and OS/2 both have built in support for it, a free client is also available for

intel etherexpress pro 100 nics at my lan, server with tftp, nfsserver and pxelinux running for about half a year at my lan. Hi, When I use a kernel v.2.4.20 the pxe boot loads the pxefiles, kernel and then stops asking for files from the server and complains about a "Root-NFS: No NFS server available, giving up." and messages about to insert a disk... ... the same .config used with

Dr. Tweedie, et al.: I recently formatted a partition using EXT3, and after a "df -h" I get 14GB of space. When I reformatted the partition with ReiserFS, and did a "df -h" I got 16GB of space! Now the partition was setup to be 16GB via fdisk, so 16GB is correct. However, why does EXT3 loose 2GB of space? The journals cannot be that big!?! Very Respectfully, Stuart