search for: klog

...:38:38:Mailing List Manager:/var/list:/bin/sh irc:x:39:39:ircd:/var/run/ircd:/bin/sh gnats:x:41:41:Gnats Bug-Reporting System (admin):/var/lib/gnats:/bin/sh nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/nonexistent:/bin/sh dhcp:x:100:101::/nonexistent:/bin/false syslog:x:101:102::/home/syslog:/bin/false klog:x:102:103::/home/klog:/bin/false hplip:x:103:7:HPLIP system user,,,:/var/run/hplip:/bin/false avahi-autoipd:x:104:112:Avahi autoip daemon,,,:/var/lib/avahi-autoipd:/bin/false messagebus:x:105:113::/var/run/dbus:/bin/false avahi:x:106:114:Avahi mDNS daemon,,,:/var/run/avahi-daemon:/bin/false...

...;ENOSPC with mkdir and rename", but now I have a device with 100GB unallocated on the "btrfs fi sh" output, and when I run a rebalance of the form: > btrfs filesystem balance start -dusage=50 -musage=10 "$mount" I get more than 75 of such stack traces contaminating the klog. I've put some of them up in a gist here: https://gist.github.com/pwaller/1df8a7efc2f10343f2e3 and one of them is reproduced below. Is this harmful or expected? Are there any workarounds? Thanks, - Peter [376007.681938] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [376007.681957] WARNING: CPU: 1 PI...

...1 lm announce = No wins server = 192.168.132.25 lock spin count = 30 lock spin time = 15 remote announce = 192.168.132.255/IWU_LEARN panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d invalid users = backup, bin, daemon, dhcp, games, gnats, irc, klog, list, lp, mail, man, news, nobody, postfix, proxy, sync, sys, syslog, uucp, www-data, root hosts allow = 192.168.132., 10., 172.16.1., 127.0.0.1 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0 ea support = Yes map acl inherit = Yes change notify timeout = 300 [homes] commen...

DeaRs, I have a doubt about: BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) SBIC (Schwartz Bayesian Informarion Criterion) SIC (Schwartz Information Criterion) In many references these are know as the same (eg. stepAIC() function) but I just found a SAS8.2 output that show either the BIC and SIC values for a logistic regression.. simillary values but different. 1) question: What are the differences?

I think I have come across what seems to be a bug in the interplay between Samba and AFS. I'm running 1.9.16p11 on an IBM RS/6000 (AIX 4.1.5) with the AFS support included (AFS 3.4a). The client machine is running Windows 95. I've created an AFS area which is writeable (rlidwk) to an AFS protection group. The group contains two AFS users, say user1 and user2. If user1 creates a file in

...flags: ./configure --with-pam --with-xauth=/usr/openwin/bin/xauth --with-tcp-wrappers --with-ssl-directory=/usr/local/ssl users could log into their machines via OpenSSH, and through PAM, an AFS token would be generated. After upgrading OpenSSH, tokens are no longer generated, and users must run klog to authenticate to AFS. Please contact me if you need more information. This issue has been discussed at OpenAFS as well: https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2003-September/010738.html Thanks for your time and consideration, Ian ------- You are receiving this mail because: ----...

...fido pci ttyp2 usb0 ata geom.ctl ppi0 ttyv0 usb1 atkbd0 io psm0 ttyv1 xpt0 bpf0 kbd0 ptyp0 ttyv2 zero bpsm0 klog ptyp1 ttyv3 console kmem ptyp2 ttyv4 consolectl log random ttyv5 these are my devices and I have make bold the possible devices that I could use according your manual. The strange thing is that should be a sioN device som...

...Without going to in-depth, OpenAFS introduces (in the kernel) a PAG (`Process Authentication Group`) context, which allows the same user (or multiple users) to use various credentials. Therefore each new `rsync` process will start with a new PAG, and before accessing any files, one must call the `klog` tool to authenticate. However as said above, one can`t use `pre-xfer exec` because that executes after `chdir` which fails. For reference: * https://docs.openafs.org/Reference/1/pagsh.html * https://github.com/openafs/openafs/blob/master/src/sys/setpag.c * `k_setpag` -- http://manpages.ubuntu.co...

Well, now that I''ve figured out that network booting XCP is not really going to be feasible, I''m moving on to my next option: flash media installation. The systems that I purchased have SDHC slots on them, so I figured I''d attempt to install XCP to one of these cards. I had already read that there''s a minimum disk size in the installer (apparently 12 GB in

...r/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d /dev/null '%u' lm announce = No preferred master = No domain master = No wins server = 192.168.132.25 panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d invalid users = backup, bin, daemon, dhcp, games, gnats, irc, klog, list, lp, mail, man, news, nobody, postfix, proxy, sync, sys, syslog, uucp, www-data, root hosts allow = 192.168.132., 10., 172.16.1., 127.0.0.1 remote announce = 192.168.132.255/IWUADMIN [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S browseable = No...

...e_module(const char *, size_t) -int delete_module(const char *) +long init_module(void *, unsigned long, const char *) +long delete_module(const char *, unsigned int) <!ia64> int query_module(const char *, int, void *, size_t, size_t) int reboot::__reboot(int, int, int, void *) int syslog::klogctl(int, char *, int) ===== klibc/klibc/syscommon.h 1.1 vs edited ===== --- klibc/klibc/syscommon.h Wed Oct 22 19:37:34 2003 +++ klibc/klibc/syscommon.h Wed Nov 26 16:29:06 2003 @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ #include <sys/dirent.h> #include <sys/klog.h> #include <sys/mman.h> -#include <s...

This patchset applies to klibc mainline. As is it will probably collide with Maximilian's recent patch to rename run-init to switch_root posted last week. To boot an untrusted environment with certain capabilities locked out, we'd like to be able to drop the capabilities up front from early userspace, before we actually transition onto the root volume. This patchset implements this by

...-20 01:05:35.000000000 +0100 @@ -142,5 +142,6 @@ void * create_module(const char *, size_t) int delete_module(const char *) int query_module(const char *, int, void *, size_t, size_t) +long init_module(void *, unsigned long, const char *) int reboot::__reboot(int, int, int, void *) int syslog::klogctl(int, char *, int) Binary files klibc-0.70/utils/insmod and klibc-0.70+insmod/utils/insmod differ diff -urN klibc-0.70/utils/insmod.c klibc-0.70+insmod/utils/insmod.c --- klibc-0.70/utils/insmod.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ klibc-0.70+insmod/utils/insmod.c 2002-12-23 13:40:16.0000000...

Hi list, after upgrading our ldap server, the Domain Admins group doesn't work anymore. Members of the domain admins group don't have any special rights on the workstations (for example, they cannot even change the date of a machine in the domain anymore). When I lookup the group members I get:

...anum said he once recompiled ls to reboot if it is run by root. Another trick involves recompiling /bin/sh to check to see if it has a tty (shells spawned by network daemons will generally not). Perhaps there is some way to locate any part of the kernel that performs access control and optionally klog the details, so that any actions which are denied also automatically detect possible intrusions? Hmm, I should mention this to elad efrat, who is doing kauth work on NetBSD... -- "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate." Unix "guru" for rent...

...s the user. OpenSSH could be built on systems that may or may not have AFS installed and run on a system with or without AFS. The decision is based on the existence of the executable and any options in sshd_config. In its simplest form, all that is needed is: system("/usr/ssh/libexec/aklog -setpag") This is a little over simplified as there should be a test if the executable exists, processing of some return codes, making sure the environment is set, setting some time limit. etc. But the point is there is no compile dependence on OpenAFS, MIT or Hiemdal by the OpenSSH sshd...

We just had a security application vendor come in. We asked about Linux support and he said that putting a security application on top of an insecure OS was useless. When I asked what he meant by insecure he replied that Linux does not have a true Auditing capability - as opposed to HP-UX & Solaris which they do support. Can anyone explain to me what he was talking about? Thanks, Marty

...rk sort of fine. - The problem I'm experiencing is that Samba doesn't seem to be keeping its own tokens for the client session, it's using the ones that are currently on the server. That is, I can only access files in AFS space through Samba if an AFS user with access to those files is klogged onto my Samba server. Essentially, it doesn't look like Samba is dealing with AFS authentication at all. Can anyone help me out with this? How do I force Samba to authenticate using AFS, and keep track of separate tokens per separate session? I haven't done anything fancy with the smb...

I have updated the klibc patchset based on feedback received. In particular, the patchset has been reorganized so as not to break git-bisect. Additionally, this updates the patch base to 2.6.17-git12 (d38b69689c349f35502b92e20dafb30c62d49d63) and klibc 1.4.8; the main difference on the klibc side is removal of obsolete code. This is also available as a git tree at: