search for: klnmszap32

...Volker, I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 In this file there are about 3 occurrences of the "NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION". The first is in line 2661. Also I'll try to set the share-modes to "no" and look how it behaves. Thanks that you want to analyze this. I hope that we would find a solution. Regards from Col...

...to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. > Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: > > Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): > https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 > > In this file there are about 3 occurrences of the "NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION". > The first is in line 2661. > > Also I'll try to set the share-modes to "no" and look how it behaves. > > Thanks that you want to analyze this. I hope that we would...

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.