search for: kleineweber

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:38:57PM +0100, Christoph Kleineweber wrote: > > I am wondering if there is a way to bypass Samba's ACL checks and > delegate > > access control completely to the underlying file system. > > > > My problem arises from the following scenario: Our file system implements > > ACLs that are to the best o...

On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 10:57 +0100, Christoph Kleineweber via samba wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:38:57PM +0100, Christoph Kleineweber > > wrote: > > > I am wondering if there is a way to bypass Samba's ACL checks and > >...

Hi all, I am wondering if there is a way to bypass Samba's ACL checks and delegate access control completely to the underlying file system. My problem arises from the following scenario: Our file system implements ACLs that are to the best of my knowledge currently not readable by any of the existing VFS modules. When trying to access a file with an ACL going beyond the file's POSIX

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Christoph Kleineweber wrote: > > The nfs4-acl-tools make also use of xattrs to access ACLs. The ACL itself > > is XDR encoded, so access could be done directly by a VFS module and does > > not require the executable. > > This sounds as if it would be possible to write a VFS module to access >...

> > > > > I am wondering if there is a way to bypass Samba's ACL checks and > > > delegate > > > > access control completely to the underlying file system. > > > > > > > > My problem arises from the following scenario: Our file system > implements > > > > ACLs that are to the best of my knowledge currently not readable