Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "kiviaho".
Did you mean:
kivalo
1998 Oct 20
3
SAMBA 1.9.18p10 problem
...s of list
> Subject: SAMBA digest 1848
>
> SAMBA Digest 1848
>
> For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc
> Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1) Re: Changing "Shutdown" to "Log off" in Win95?
> by Kalle Kiviaho <kivi@ios.chalmers.se>
> 2) Compiling on Linux 2.1.125
> by Bilal Siddiqui <Bilal.Siddiqui@Mankato.MSUS.edu>
> 3) Re-exporting NFS shares to Samba
> by Rudo de Jong <crj@dds.nl>
> 4) Re: Setting individual umasks for Homes
> by "Robert Dahlem"...
1999 Apr 05
2
Print Jobs in /tmp
I have a quick printing question:
When users print through Samba, a copy of the print job is ALWAYS left in /tmp
and not erased. When I print through lpr, this is not the case. I am using
LPRng 3.5.3, Samba 2.0.3, Kernel 2.2.4, and RHL 5.2 with all the update RPMs.
Here are the relevant sections of my smb.conf file:
[global]
printing = lprng
print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -P%p %s -r
1998 Oct 18
2
Changing "Shutdown" to "Log off" in Win95?
The Samba set up we're using to support 25 or so Win 95 clients
is working well, but my users are usually not up to complicated
tasks. Has anyone found a way to get logging out down to a single
action (like, Start/Logout), instead of Start/Shutdown/Close all
programs and log in as another user/Yes?
I'm tired of explaining this already! :)
Daryl
Daryl Biberdorf darylb@superserve.com
1999 Apr 28
3
License manager
Has anyone successfully incorporated a Win95 app that uses FlexLM
license manager on a Samba file system. I would be extremely interested
in talking with you as we are trying to install Parametric Technology's
ProEngineer on our Samba file server. We do have a copy of the
Unix version of the license manager, but I am not sure how I can get
the Win95 client to talk to it.
Any and all
1998 Oct 15
3
Performance tips for heavily loaded servers
Does nayone have a collection of performance tips for heavily loaded
samba servers?
I have a server that routinely has 45-90 connections and just runs really
poorly. We've thrown more memory at it w/ some benefit, but not
significant.
This is on a linux 2.0.35 based machine.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
-- Nathan
------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan