Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "kirpichenko".
Did you mean:
kirichenko
2023 Oct 29
1
State of the gluster project
29.10.2023 00:07, Zakhar Kirpichenko ?????:
> I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since
> about 9.0, if not earlier.
Well, really earlier.
Attempt to get better gluster as gluster2 in 4.0 failed...
2023 Oct 28
2
State of the gluster project
I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since about
9.0, if not earlier. It's time to embrace the truth and move on.
/Z
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 11:21, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well,
>
> After IBM acquisition, RH discontinued their support in many projects
> including GlusterFS (certification exams were removed,
2023 Oct 27
1
State of the gluster project
..., backup
everything and restart from scratch every 3-4 months. And there are no
tools helping, just log digging :( Even at version 9.6 seems it's not
really "production ready"... More like v0.9.6 IMVHO. And now it being
EOLed makes it way worse.
Diego
Il 27/10/2023 09:40, Zakhar Kirpichenko ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Red Hat Gluster Storage is EOL, Red Hat moved Gluster devs to other
> projects, so Gluster doesn't get much attention. From my experience, it
> has deteriorated since about version 9.0, and we're migrating to
> alternatives.
>
> /Z
>
&g...
2023 Oct 27
1
State of the gluster project
...rt from scratch every 3-4 months. And there are no
> tools helping, just log digging :( Even at version 9.6 seems it's not
> really "production ready"... More like v0.9.6 IMVHO. And now it being
> EOLed makes it way worse.
>
> Diego
>
> Il 27/10/2023 09:40, Zakhar Kirpichenko ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Red Hat Gluster Storage is EOL, Red Hat moved Gluster devs to other
> > projects, so Gluster doesn't get much attention. From my experience, it
> > has deteriorated since about version 9.0, and we're migrating to
> > alternativ...
2023 Oct 27
1
State of the gluster project
...nths. And there are no
>> tools helping, just log digging :( Even at version 9.6 seems it's not
>> really "production ready"... More like v0.9.6 IMVHO. And now it being
>> EOLed makes it way worse.
>>
>> Diego
>>
>> Il 27/10/2023 09:40, Zakhar Kirpichenko ha scritto:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Red Hat Gluster Storage is EOL, Red Hat moved Gluster devs to other
>>> projects, so Gluster doesn't get much attention. From my experience, it
>>> has deteriorated since about version 9.0, and we're migrating to
>&...
2023 Oct 27
1
State of the gluster project
Hi,
Red Hat Gluster Storage is EOL, Red Hat moved Gluster devs to other
projects, so Gluster doesn't get much attention. From my experience, it has
deteriorated since about version 9.0, and we're migrating to alternatives.
/Z
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 10:29, Marcus Peders?n <marcus.pedersen at slu.se>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just have a general thought about the gluster
>
2023 Oct 27
1
State of the gluster project
...nths. And there are no
>> tools helping, just log digging :( Even at version 9.6 seems it's not
>> really "production ready"... More like v0.9.6 IMVHO. And now it being
>> EOLed makes it way worse.
>>
>> Diego
>>
>> Il 27/10/2023 09:40, Zakhar Kirpichenko ha scritto:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Red Hat Gluster Storage is EOL, Red Hat moved Gluster devs to other
>>> projects, so Gluster doesn't get much attention. From my experience, it
>>> has deteriorated since about version 9.0, and we're migrating to
>&...
2023 Oct 28
1
State of the gluster project
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 11:07:52PM +0300, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote:
> I don't think it's worth it for anyone. It's a dead project since about
> 9.0, if not earlier. It's time to embrace the truth and move on.
Which is shame because I choose GlusterFS for one of my storage clusters
_specifically_ due to the ease of emergency data recove...