search for: kirjutas

On Monday 14 August 2017 10:22:54 Sander Lepik wrote: > 14.08.2017 09:24 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > > PS! I really hate systemd - Destroys the UNIX way of > > doing things with a heavy axe.... > > Don't hate it, better learn to use it: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/systemd#Drop-in_files Cannot find a way to "remove" the ProtectSystem setting as th...

Hi! Have been using Fedora as my dovecot server for some time and am struggling with systemd at every update. Fedora insists on setting ProtectSystem=full in both dovecot.service and postfix.service at every update of the packages. This makes my mailstore which is in /usr/local/var/mail Read-only. And this makes the incoming emails delivered through dovecot-lda disappear into /dev/null until I

Hi! We have 2 servers replicating each other and after upgrade to 2.2.26.0 we are seeing this in the logs: Primary server: Nov 17 09:37:39 mailhost01 dovecot: dsync-server(user at domain.ee): Panic: file dsync-brain-mailbox.c: line 814 (dsync_brain_slave_recv_mailbox): assertion failed: (memcmp(dsync_box->mailbox_guid, local_dsync_box.mailbox_guid, sizeof(dsync_box->mailbox_guid)) == 0)

17.11.2016 11:01 Sander Lepik kirjutas: > Hi! > > We have 2 servers replicating each other and after upgrade to 2.2.26.0 > we are seeing this in the logs: > > Primary server: > > Nov 17 09:37:39 mailhost01 dovecot: dsync-server(user at domain.ee): Panic: > file dsync-brain-mailbox.c: line 814 (dsync_brain_s...

14.08.2017 09:24 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > > Hi! > > Have been using Fedora as my dovecot server for > some time and am struggling with systemd > at every update. > Fedora insists on setting > ProtectSystem=full in both dovecot.service and postfix.service > at every update of the packages. > > This mak...

I need help to resolve this issue. I saw that Andrew put a patch by Antti to enable users without full admin access to join samba into an AD domain. I am playing with it and always get "Insufficient access". Using the same user, I can join a Windows box into the domain just fine. The user is a member of "domain users", but not "domain admins". I can use a

Hi, Can anyone provide any metrics on how effective this variable is on providing speed improvements on Intel systems? Is it beneficial for all Intel cards or only some? Is it all FUD? :) I'm thinking about this from a packagers perspective such that we can add support for seamless startup/integration. Thanks. Col.

On 14-03-13 21:24, Declan Kelly wrote: > No. I want the tightest possible compression, while remaining 100% > compatible with the subset that all known FLAC decoders can successfully > stream or play now in cars, Hi-Fi units, "MP3 players" and cell phones. > The out and out most widely supported lossless audio format could (and > should) have a better "bang for the

Hello Is it planned someday to implement additional higher (9-12) compression modes like in Flake? http://flake-enc.sourceforge.net/ It's not very important I think. Harddrive space isn't problem today. But it preserves other indepentent work done on Flac and give room for some extra albums on harddrive. I think development of flake is stopped. I plan to test my ~20 GB flac

Hello, i upgraded debian from lenny to squeeze and i managed to mess up config file or update (cuz i'm quite noob when it comes to linux). I'm gonna try to explain best to my abillity, how i got where i am right now (bear in mind that this is my first time in this list). Since smbpasswd and pdbedit had mysteriously vanished after upgrade, i did reinstall to samba (3.5.6 PDC with

?hel kenal p?eval (neljap?ev, 14. m?rts 2013 19:02:35) kirjutas Declan Kelly: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06:51PM -0400, benski at winamp.com wrote: > > Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I > > remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as > > well. I believe some of the tech...

Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as well. I believe some of the techniques used in libflake were added to libFLAC in 1.1.4. However, some of the improved compression in flake was due to options that are outside the FLAC 'subset', such as larger blocksize, greater number of

Hi! I'm using: Dovecot 1.0.beta8 OpenBSD 3.9 KMail 1.9.3 My password file contains only one user now. I've changed its password to a dumb one: 'asd' (so this is not a wrong password failure :) I've configured the PLAIN and DIGEST-MD5 mechanisms in dovecot.conf, and I'm only using pop3. Also I've turned on the verbose auth logging, and I'm attaching the logs

...-------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Marko Uibo <vinyylimees at gmail.com> > To: flac-dev at xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:16:37 +0200 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Higher compression modes from Flake > ?hel kenal p?eval (neljap?ev, 14. m?rts 2013 19:02:35) kirjutas Declan > Kelly: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06:51PM -0400, benski at winamp.com wrote: > > > Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, > I > > > remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster > as > > &gt...