search for: kiril

On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>>> on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: > > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: > > Current R-exts reads > > > s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall,...

>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:26 +0200 writes: > On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> >> >> On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>>> Kirill...

...e. See also R_has_methods_attached() (https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/42ecf5f492a005f5398cbb4c9becd4aa5af9d05c/src/main/objects.c#L258-L265). I'm fine with Rscript not loading "methods", as long as everything works properly with "methods" loaded but not attached. -Kirill On 19.04.2016 04:10, Michael Lawrence wrote: > Right, the methods package is not attached by default when running R > with Rscript. We should probably remove that special case, as it > mostly just leads to confusion, but that won't happen immediately. > > For now, the S4_exten...

...s to decide if the methods package needs to be loaded. ~G On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com > wrote: > Not sure why R_has_methods_attached() exists. Maybe Martin could shed > some light on that. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kirill M?ller > <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> wrote: > > Thanks for looking into it, your approach sounds good to me. See also > > R_has_methods_attached() > > ( > https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/42ecf5f492a005f5398cbb4c9becd4aa5af9d05c/src/main/objects.c#L258-L2...

...oted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: Current R-exts reads s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx); but I believe it has to be PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(s = eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx); because PROTECT_WITH_INDEX() returns void. Best regards Kirill

...; On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Michael Lawrence > > <lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote: > >> > >> Not sure why R_has_methods_attached() exists. Maybe Martin could shed > >> some light on that. > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kirill M?ller > >> <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> wrote: > >> > Thanks for looking into it, your approach sounds good to me. See also > >> > R_has_methods_attached() > >> > > >> > ( > https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/42ecf5f492a0...

...ks like a sanity check in line 655 of src/main/attrib.c is making wrong assumptions, but there might be other reasons. (https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/780021752eb83a71e2198019acf069ba8741103b/src/main/attrib.c#L655-L656) Same behavior in R 3.2.4, R 3.2.5 and R-devel r70420. Best regards Kirill

Hi Gordon, I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? Thanks in advance. Kirill. int some_test_func( int ){ std::cout << "!!!!" << std::endl; return 8848; } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]){ Module *M = new Module("test"); ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new ExistingModuleProvider(M); ExecutionEngine* EE = ExecutionEngine::create(MP, f...

On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill M?ller wrote: > > > On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>>>> on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: >> > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in t...

Hello all. What we have: SL6 - kernel 2.6.32-131.2.1.el6.x86_64 btrfs on mdadm RAID5 with 8 HDD - 27T partition. I see this at top: 1182 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 100.0 0.0 16:39.73 [btrfs-delalloc-] And LA is grow. What is this and how can I fix it? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

...nding version of the package and trying to execute newTest() from Rscript. I have attached the output. The package itself is on GitHub: https://github.com/krlmlr/methodsTest , there is a branch for each scenario. Why does it seem to be necessary to load the methods package here? Best regards Kirill

...l industrial VM engine to compare. For instance, check Microsoft .NET or if you cannot do this "for legal reason" try Java HotSpot. But not a 5 years old version, although even that should give you more objective results that you can understand what these benchmark mean in fact. Thanks, Kirill 2009/3/2 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > > On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Kirill Kononenko wrote: > >> Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users > > Hi Kirill, > > Please talk to Nicholas about this, thanks! > > -Chris > >> >> >> I woul...

Hi Kirill, Thanks for your reply. Such a simple flat file approach would be perfect, and I don't mind at all to require app specific usernames *and* passwords. However, I am unsure how to combine your recipe below with our regular AD userdb/passdb. Perhaps someone can give me some pointers in that...

On 10.03.2016 15:49, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 10/03/2016 8:27 AM, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> I can't seem to reliably obtain parse data via getParseData() for >> functions from installed packages. The parse data seems to be available >> only for the *last* file in the package. >> >> See [1] for a small example package with just two functi...

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:39:13PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Hi Kirill, > > 2009/1/27 Kirill Smelkov <kirr at mns.spb.ru> > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:58:23PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > Arjen, Arnaud, > > > first of all, I'm sorry for my late reply. > > > > > > If it's not too late, here i...

...: [...] ... and ..1, ..2 etc, which are used to refer to arguments passed down from a calling function, see ?... . I have pasted a reproducible example below. I'd like to suggest to convert these to "...#" and "....", respectively. Happy to contribute PR. Best regards Kirill make.names(c("..1", "..13", "...")) #> [1] "..1"? "..13" "..." `..1` <- 1 `..13` <- 13 `...` <- "dots" mget(c("..1", "..13", "...")) #> $..1 #> [1] 1 #> #> $..13 #> [1]...

...it and pnet were merged in 0.7.4. Now that we all know pnet and libjit are two separate, alive, projects, we will stop refering to pnet only. The VMKit paper got rid of libjit references. As for the LLVM developer meeting presentation, there is no mention of libjit. End of the story. Nicolas Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > Just in case that this information does not get corrupted I want to > point to the issue: > > > In http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf it is on > page 21: "VMKit, Mono, PNet", Array bounds checks. > &gt...

Hi Kirill, Don't forget to add X86TargetMachine.obj (add to Additional Dependencies in Linker options, if you are using MSVS) otherwise LLVM will try and use Interpreter instead of JIT. Hope this helps, Rob. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bo...

Not sure why R_has_methods_attached() exists. Maybe Martin could shed some light on that. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> wrote: > Thanks for looking into it, your approach sounds good to me. See also > R_has_methods_attached() > (https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/42ecf5f492a005f5398cbb4c9becd4aa5af9d05c/src/main/objects.c#L258-L265). > > I'm fin...

"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill at shutemov.name> writes: > Hello, > > I found that on particular queries notmuch return different results if run > the query few times. Re-initialing the query or db doesn't help. > > I've attached test case along with corpus of messages....