search for: kindstrings

...ms. b) Use two high bits of lld::Reference::_kindValue field to encode RSS_xxx value. Then decode these bits in the RelocationHandler to calculate result of relocation. In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind value in YAML format. The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will not satisfy us. c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like the DefinedAtom::CodeModel field. Any advices, ideas, and/or objections are much appreciated. -- Simon Atanasyan

...eld to encode >> RSS_xxx value. >> Then decode these bits in the RelocationHandler to calculate result >> of relocation. >> In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind >> value in YAML format. >> The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will not >> satisfy us. >> c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like the >> DefinedAtom::CodeModel >> field. >> >> Any advices, ideas, and/or objections are much appreciated. >> >> > > -- > Qualcomm Innovat...

...Reference::_kindValue field to encode > RSS_xxx value. > Then decode these bits in the RelocationHandler to calculate result > of relocation. > In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind > value in YAML format. > The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will not > satisfy us. > c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like the > DefinedAtom::CodeModel > field. > > Any advices, ideas, and/or objections are much appreciated. > > > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of...

...t;>> Then decode these bits in the RelocationHandler to calculate result > >>> of relocation. > >>> In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind > >>> value in YAML format. > >>> The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will not > >>> satisfy us. > >>> c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like the > >>> DefinedAtom::CodeModel > >>> field. > >>> > >>> Any advices, ideas, and/or objections are much appreciated...

...gt;>> RSS_xxx value. >>> Then decode these bits in the RelocationHandler to calculate result >>> of relocation. >>> In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind >>> value in YAML format. >>> The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will not satisfy us. >>> c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like the >>> DefinedAtom::CodeModel >>> field. >>> >>> Any advices, ideas, and/or objections are much appreciated. >>> >>> -- >>> Si...

...to calculate > >> >>> result > >> >>> of relocation. > >> >>> In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind > >> >>> value in YAML format. > >> >>> The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will > not > >> >>> satisfy us. > >> >>> c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like > the > >> >>> DefinedAtom::CodeModel > >> >>> field. > >> >>> > >> >&gt...

...; >> >>> result >> >> >>> of relocation. >> >> >>> In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind >> >> >>> value in YAML format. >> >> >>> The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will >> not >> >> >>> satisfy us. >> >> >>> c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like >> the >> >> >>> DefinedAtom::CodeModel >> >> >>> field. >> >> >&g...

...> Then decode these bits in the RelocationHandler to calculate result >>>>> of relocation. >>>>> In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation kind >>>>> value in YAML format. >>>>> The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array will not >> satisfy us. >>>>> c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something like the >>>>> DefinedAtom::CodeModel >>>>> field. >>>>> >>>>> Any advices, ideas, and/or objections are much appreci...

...gt;> >>> of relocation. >>>> >> >>> In that case the problem is how to represent a relocation >>>> kind >>>> >> >>> value in YAML format. >>>> >> >>> The simple xxxRelocationStringTable::kindStrings[] array >>>> will not >>>> >> >>> satisfy us. >>>> >> >>> c) Add one more field to the lld::Reference class. Something >>>> like the >>>> >> >>> DefinedAtom::CodeModel >>>> >>...