search for: kindhandler

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "kindhandler".

2012 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLD AbsoluteAtoms
...obably would have been easier. I will submit the patch anyway later today or tomorrow. What exactly to do with symbols that live in special sections, SHN_LORESERVE and up has been an ongoing discussion. If we keep the object file format reader classes final adding target specific hooks, like kindHandler seems like a possible option. >> STT_FILE >> Conventionally, the symbol's name gives the name of the source file associated with the object file. A file symbol has STB_LOCAL binding and its section index is SHN_ABS. This symbol, if present, precedes the other STB_LOCAL symbols...
2012 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] LLD AbsoluteAtoms
...ill submit the > patch anyway later today or tomorrow. > > > > What exactly to do with symbols that live in special sections, > SHN_LORESERVE and up has been an ongoing discussion. If we keep the object > file format reader classes final adding target specific hooks, like > kindHandler seems like a possible option. > > > > > > > > > > > >>> STT_FILE > >>> Conventionally, the symbol's name gives the name of the source file > associated with the object file. A file symbol has STB_LOCAL binding and > its section index i...
2012 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLD AbsoluteAtoms
...would have been easier. I will submit the patch anyway later today or tomorrow. > > What exactly to do with symbols that live in special sections, SHN_LORESERVE and up has been an ongoing discussion. If we keep the object file format reader classes final adding target specific hooks, like kindHandler seems like a possible option. > > > > > >>> STT_FILE >>> Conventionally, the symbol's name gives the name of the source file associated with the object file. A file symbol has STB_LOCAL binding and its section index is SHN_ABS. This symbol, if present, prec...
2012 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] LLD AbsoluteAtoms
...ve been easier. I will submit the patch anyway later today or tomorrow. > > > > What exactly to do with symbols that live in special sections, SHN_LORESERVE and up has been an ongoing discussion. If we keep the object file format reader classes final adding target specific hooks, like kindHandler seems like a possible option. > > > > > > > > > > > >>> STT_FILE > >>> Conventionally, the symbol's name gives the name of the source file associated with the object file. A file symbol has STB_LOCAL binding and its section index is SHN_ABS....
2012 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLD AbsoluteAtoms
On Oct 15, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Sidney Manning wrote: > > I think that absolute atoms will need something similar to, "contentType" added. > > SHN_ABS symbols can have different types, STT_OBJECT, STT_FILE and maybe others. In order for the writer to tell it must have a way to reach back and ask the atom what type of symbols caused it to be created. To that end I added a
2012 Oct 15
3
[LLVMdev] LLD AbsoluteAtoms
I think that absolute atoms will need something similar to, "contentType" added. SHN_ABS symbols can have different types, STT_OBJECT, STT_FILE and maybe others. In order for the writer to tell it must have a way to reach back and ask the atom what type of symbols caused it to be created. To that end I added a contentType method to AbsoluteAtom and sprinkled changes around to