Displaying 20 results from an estimated 149 matches for "kicinski".
2020 Nov 22
3
[PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warn...
2020 Nov 22
3
[PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warn...
2020 Nov 22
3
[PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warn...
2020 Nov 24
4
[PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > If none of the 140 patches here fix a real bug, and there is no change
> > to machine code then it sounds to me like a W=2 kind of a warning.
>
> FWIW, this series has found at least one bug so far:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAFCwf11izHF=g1mGry1fE5kvFFFrxzhPSM6q...
2020 Nov 24
4
[PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > If none of the 140 patches here fix a real bug, and there is no change
> > to machine code then it sounds to me like a W=2 kind of a warning.
>
> FWIW, this series has found at least one bug so far:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAFCwf11izHF=g1mGry1fE5kvFFFrxzhPSM6q...
2020 Nov 24
4
[PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > If none of the 140 patches here fix a real bug, and there is no change
> > to machine code then it sounds to me like a W=2 kind of a warning.
>
> FWIW, this series has found at least one bug so far:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAFCwf11izHF=g1mGry1fE5kvFFFrxzhPSM6q...
2017 Dec 03
2
5.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
...ne minor adjustment ("; CHECK: r{{[0-9]+}} = 8589934591 ll" in
> the original commit
> to "; CHECK: r{{[0-9]+}} = 8589934591ll" in this patch) for the test case.
>
> Reported-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend at gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski at netronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang at netronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs at fb.com>
>
> diff --git a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
> b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
> index 81b0aa7..5740b49 10...
2020 Nov 20
2
[PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in
> > > order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang.
> > >
> > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-f...
2019 Feb 28
2
[virtio-dev] Re: net_failover slave udev renaming (was Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework)
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 20:26:02 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:52:05PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:41:32 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > As this scheme adds much complexity to the kernel naming convention
> > > > (currently it's just ethX names) that no userspace can understand.
> > >
> > > Anyt...
2018 Jan 27
4
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 2/2] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:30:35 -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 1/26/2018 2:47 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 00:14:20 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 01:46:42PM -0800, Siwei Liu wrote:
> >>>> and the VM is not expected to do any tuning/optimizations on the VF driver
> >>>> directly,
> >>&...
2019 Dec 10
0
[PATCH net-next v10 3/3] netronome: use the new txqueue timeout argument
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski at netronome.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
index 41a808b14d76..e...
2019 Nov 24
1
[PATCH net-next v2] drivers: net: virtio_net: Implement a dev_watchdog handler
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 16:48:35 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c b/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c
> index a4ebd2445eda..8e06e7407854 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c
> +++ b/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int nfeth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void
2019 Dec 10
0
[PATCH net-next v10 3/3] netronome: use the new txqueue timeout argument
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski at netronome.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
index 41a808b14d76..e...
2023 Jan 31
1
[PATCH 01/23] block: factor out a bvec_set_page helper
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:47:58PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> kinda random thought but since we're touching this area - could we
> perhaps move the definition of struct bio_vec and trivial helpers
> like this into a new header? bvec.h pulls in mm.h which is a right
> behemoth :S
I bet we can drop mm.h now. It was originally added f...
2023 Mar 05
1
[PATCH v3] virtio-net: Fix probe of virtio-net on kvmtool
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:46:03PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 04:48:38 -0500 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Looks not the core can try to enable and disable features according to
> > > the diff between features and hw_features
> > >
> > > static inline netdev_features_t netdev_get_wanted_fea...
2023 Aug 29
1
[PATCH v3 0/3] vduse: add support for networking devices
On 8/11/23 00:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:42:11 -0400 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> Directly into the stack? I thought VDUSE is vDPA in user space,
>>> meaning to get to the kernel the packet has to first go thru
>>> a virtio-net instance.
>>
>> yes. is that a suffic...
2023 Aug 29
1
[PATCH v3 0/3] vduse: add support for networking devices
On 8/11/23 00:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:42:11 -0400 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> Directly into the stack? I thought VDUSE is vDPA in user space,
>>> meaning to get to the kernel the packet has to first go thru
>>> a virtio-net instance.
>>
>> yes. is that a suffic...
2023 Aug 29
1
[PATCH v3 0/3] vduse: add support for networking devices
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:34:06PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 8/11/23 00:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:42:11 -0400 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Directly into the stack? I thought VDUSE is vDPA in user space,
> > > > meaning to get to the kernel the packet has to first go thru
> > > > a virtio-net instance.
> > >...
2019 Feb 28
4
[virtio-dev] Re: net_failover slave udev renaming (was Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework)
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:36:56 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > It is a bit of a the chicken or the egg situation ;) But users can
> > just blacklist, too. Anyway, I think this is far better than module
> > parameters
>
> Sorry I'm a bit confused. What is better than what?
I mean that blacklist net_failover or module param to disable
net_failover and handle in
2017 Dec 21
1
[RFC PATCH] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 02:33:34PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:40:36 -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> > +static int virtio_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
> > + unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *event_dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
> > +...