search for: kicad

Hi Everyone I would like to use kicad for circuit design. It does not appear to be in the repos. I have built all the other software that I need and not included in the repos from source but I have struggled with kicad. There looks to be lots of places on the net that I can download RPMs not in the repos from but I don't know whi...

Hi all. Is there an electronic circuit design CAD package available for Centos 5.5 please? Kind Regards, Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net]

...e the CentOS SCL to fix this issue? EPEL7 is nowhere near as useful as it could be due to versioning policy and due to the upstream EL7 being so inflexible in versioning. Case in point is boost, where EL7's 1.53 is just barely too old for lots of highly useful workstation packages (such as KiCAD, which needs 1.54+). A software collection is the correct way to do up boost 1.54 for a KiCAD 4.x package for EL7 (CentOS and SL both), but a quick perusal of the current SCL shows that boost 1.54+ is a requirement for at least two already supported SCL packages. In my opinion, the versions o...

...inconvenience. > > You must not use OS X regularly, else you?d know there is plenty of > inconvenience in this policy. There?s a whole lot of good software that is > both unsigned and not in the App Store. Examples: > > a. Most open source software. Many of these projects (e.g. KiCad) can > barely manage to serve community-provided unsigned binaries on OS X as it > is. Signing apps and managing the App Store submission process is out of > the question. The next version of OS X will block all the third-party app > repositories (e.g. Homebrew) by default, in order t...

On 10/27/2017 2:54 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > I do that with a number of packages that are either newer or simply not available in the various Centos repos. In many cases it's as easy as downloading a new tar source file and adding it to the existing source rpm, doing three seconds of editing on the spec file to account for the new update, and compiling the result. Sometimes it's

Hello, My server with CentOS 6.8 just failed PCI scan, so I'm looking into vulnerable packages. PHP 5.3.3 have multiple vulnerabilities, some of them are fixed/patched or have some kind of workaround. But I can't find a way to fix this one. Red Hat state: under investigation. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-4073 This CVE is 6 months old, and it doesn't look like it

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > Security is *always* opposed to convenience. False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is no inconvenience. What is the inconvenience of encrypting your device

...are of it. There is no > inconvenience. You must not use OS X regularly, else you?d know there is plenty of inconvenience in this policy. There?s a whole lot of good software that is both unsigned and not in the App Store. Examples: a. Most open source software. Many of these projects (e.g. KiCad) can barely manage to serve community-provided unsigned binaries on OS X as it is. Signing apps and managing the App Store submission process is out of the question. The next version of OS X will block all the third-party app repositories (e.g. Homebrew) by default, in order to provide better sec...