search for: kh_ip0riwq

I don't really have a strong opinion, but it ended up being fairly controversial in Chromium: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/chromium-dev/-KH_IP0rIWQ It might occupy a space like GTest does for us today, which is used for things like Support where we often can't write a good lit test. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at...

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will > allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier > to maintain. I'm not claiming to be the biggest fan of some features in > GoogleMock, but on the whole, I think it's better than the

I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier to maintain. I'm not claiming to be the biggest fan of some features in GoogleMock, but on the whole, I think it's better than the alternative and will allow more careful testing of C++ APIs where the interesting part is the API itself.