search for: keyworded

If an Rd file has only one keyword entry then the Splus sgm file made with Rdconv --type=SSgm has no keyword entries. To reproduce: Use prompt() to make a skeleton help file R> f<-function(x)log(1+x)-log1p(x) R> prompt(f) Created file named 'f.Rd'. Edit the file and move it to the appropriate directory. R> q() It has 2 \keyword entries in it

All, Just a note to let yo know that CVS Head has been changed so that the AsmParser no longer recognizes the "implementation" keyword and AsmWriter no longer generates it. The grammar has changed to require the "define" keyword for function definitions which obviates the need for the implementation keyword. This has been the case for a couple months now, but we never removed

an error in my rails code caused the framework to send an infinite number of SQL calls to the database. I killed the webrick server, restarted postgres, deleted the /tmp file in my rails application, deleted the bad code, restarted firefox, restarted the webrick server. All to no avail. As soon as I try loading my application, the infinite recursion starts again. I can no longer work. This

Update: I've reverted the assembly parser change so that "implementation" will be accepted. This is to provide a grace period for you to update your .ll files. Please remove the use of implementation in your .ll files as this keyword will disappear in < 1 week. Note that the AsmWriter will not generate this keyword any more. Reid. On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 11:21 -0700, Reid

hi - i have strings that i need to extract keywords from. the string might have html tags, urls, etc. i need to extract the keywords from the string. i imagine i''m not the first guy to have to tackle this problem. is there a gem i can use or anyone have any ideas how to approach this? thanks, dino

Hi Nadav, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc1 next-20180619] [cannot apply to tip/x86/core] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

What are the limitations on using: errors.add_to_base to display errors in views? I have tried for days to add errors from my object.rb and they never get displayed. class Keyword < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of(:name, :message => "Name is required.") validates_uniqueness_of(:name, :message => "This name is already in use. Please try

first, the models: class Listing < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :keyword_links has_many :keywords, :through => :keyword_links, :conditions => "active = 1" end class Keyword < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :keyword_links has_many :listings, :through => :keyword_links, :conditions => "active = 1" end class KeywordLink < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to

Hello, I am currently using dovecot 2.0.13 and I have been working on keywords handling our webmail and I have a few questions about how dovecot handles them. First, if I am not mistaken keywords neeed to be UTF-7 encoded. That means I need to encode special caracters using values between & and - chars. UTF-7 encoding is case sensitive, &AOA- isn't the same chars as &aoa-.

When I start compiling a Wine I get this errors: > msgfmt -o po/ar.mo po/ar.po > po/ar.po:359: keyword "msgctxt" unknown > po/ar.po:359:8: parse error > po/ar.po:591: keyword "msgctxt" unknown > po/ar.po:591:8: parse error > po/ar.po:596: keyword "msgctxt" unknown > po/ar.po:596:8: parse error > po/ar.po:1157: keyword "msgctxt"

Hi, Some email clients, like Evolution, use IMAP keywords to flag spam instead of moving mail to dedicated spam mailbox. This is very useful, as false positives can be easily "moved" to original mailbox simply by removing $Junk keyword. I couldn't find a way how to integrate antispam software, like dspam, with dovecot, so that antispam automatically learns ham/spam. I have found

I have an object array @keywords = Keyword.find_by_sql(sql). Now I need to write all values of @keywords to a csv file, and because the sql statement is dynamically generated, hence the attribute names are dynamic too. How can I do it? Please help! Thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

Hi R-users and developers, This month may have seen one of the biggest thread never seen on R-related mailing lists, the one about "GPL software" and "hidden costs" (at this day, thread is still open - and active!). Lot's of mails in this thread are not really relevant to the original mail, send by Philippe Grosjean. Nevertheless, most of the mails are of interest and

Today I face with incorrect behavior in ActiveRecord. It take place when I try to use :include parameter for .find method. Where are two typical cases: 1. You have record with self-referential joins CREATE TABLE keywords (id, group_id); class Keyword < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :group, :class_name => "Keyword", :foreign_key =>

Hi R-devel, [Question]: * Is there a KEYWORDS file to lookup 'keywords' to supply the vignette command, '\VignetteKeywords{}'? -or, is the pkg writer free to tag the vignette using any keywords he/she chooses? i.e., free-tagging. Thank you, + Elliot Kleiman __________________________ San Diego State University http://www.sdsu.edu/

Ok, here is the patch again... I also included fixes for the bits that originally gave my mailer fits... Two votes for orange, so I went with orange... Doing diffs in .: --- ./lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp.~1~ 2007-12-14 22:09:06.000000000 -0800 +++ ./lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp 2007-12-15 13:02:47.000000000 -0800 @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static uint64_t HexIntToVal(const char * Result +=

Anna Zaks, David Blaikie and I have been at Grace Hopper Conference for the last couple days talking to many people about LLVM and how to get involved in the project. Its been discussed many times before at LLVM Developer Meetings and recently on the mailing list about tagging bugs with the “beginner” keyword and that keyword was recently added to the LLVM Bugzilla. However, there are very few

So I have the following data frame and I want to know how I can remove all "NA" values from each string, and also remove all "|" values from the START of the string. So they should something like "auto|insurance" or "auto|insurance|quote" one = data.frame(keyword=c("|auto", "NA|auto|insurance|quote", "NA|auto|insurance",

I am trying to debug a package to submit it to CRAN and am getting a bunch of error messages. Most of the errors are because of the Rd files which were automatically populated by the package.skeleton function. I find the section on documentation to be pretty confusion in the R Extensions manual. Any help on getting these errors fixed would be hugely appreciated. Thanks. --Markus * checking for

Hello all! I mailed the list about this yesterday, but as a reply to another email [1], so maybe it got lost: could we add a "beginner" keyword to LLVM Bugzilla, so that contributors could classify bugs as relatively simple to fix? LLVM Bugzilla has keywords like "code-cleanup" and "code-quality", which describe the nature of the PR [2]. I think a