search for: keyn

...$oldtime; > $oldtime = $nowtime; > > print $origin2; > foreach $classid (sort keys %classdata) > { > chop $classdata{$classid}{''dropped''}; > $classdata{$classid}{''bytes''} *= (8/1024); > > foreach $keyn (''bytes'',''packets'') > { > last if $printrates; > > $smoothed{$classid}{$keyn} = > $parm * (($classdata{$classid}{$keyn} - $olddata{$classid}{$keyn})/($nowtime - $last_time)) + > (1-...

.... I'm merging two datasets. one of them is 51 rows, and a typical row looks like this: midwar[midwar$dispnum==89,] dispnum synch sanum saname sbnum sbname year1 yearn ainit binit fatala 158 89 0 220 FRN 230 SPN 1822 1823 1 1 4 fatalb key1 keyn warnum year1.war yearn.war awon 158 5 2202301822 2202301823 1 1823 1823 2 The other is 3 rows, and it looks like this: dispnum synch sanum saname sbnum sbname year1 yearn ainit binit fatala fatalb 7 NA NA 70 MEX 220 FRN NA NA NA NA NA...

On 09/02/2010, at 3:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: >> Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). > > Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout and branch optimizations to happen. > >> However I sti...

...I daresay I will want to handle internal calls at some point too, although nothing stops me having dedicated per-user extensions as well as per incoming trunk. Mark -- Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450 Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes, MK8 0ER

On 21/03/2010, at 10:38 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote: >> I don't know anything about Solaris, but your paste doesn't actually >> contain any errors, just warnings (unless I'm reading "ld: warning: >> relocation error:" wrong). It might help to run make without -j until >> it fails, and then use `make VERBOSE=1` to print the exact commands >>

On 20/06/2008, at 3:30 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:56 PM, Nathan Keynes wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently if the linker encounters a pair of linkonce function >> definitions with different types, it raises an error of the form: >> >> llvm-ld: error: Cannot link file 'item.o.bc': Function >> '_ZN18st_select_lex_...

Thanks. I wonder if we could use .bc file generated by X-86 llvm-gcc to feed SPARC llvm in some cases. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Nathan Keynes Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:18 AM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Compile llvm-gcc-4.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 On 20/06/2008, at 3:22 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2008, at 2:12 PM, heguojin at ict.ac.cn wrote: > >> Has anyone succeded ? &g...

On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:56 PM, Nathan Keynes wrote: > Hi, > > Currently if the linker encounters a pair of linkonce function > definitions with different types, it raises an error of the form: > > llvm-ld: error: Cannot link file 'item.o.bc': Function > '_ZN18st_select_lex_unit12first_selectEv' d...

On 20/06/2008, at 3:22 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2008, at 2:12 PM, heguojin at ict.ac.cn wrote: > >> Has anyone succeded ? > > This sounds like the sparc backed doesn't have inline asm support, > which isn't a surprise. I'd suggest disabling bootstrapping. That was going to be my guess (PR1557 I think it is). If I get some spare cycles in the

Hi, Currently if the linker encounters a pair of linkonce function definitions with different types, it raises an error of the form: llvm-ld: error: Cannot link file 'item.o.bc': Function '_ZN18st_select_lex_unit12first_selectEv' defined as both ' %struct.SELECT_LEX* (%struct.SELECT_LEX_UNIT*)' and ' %struct.SELECT_LEX* (%struct.SELECT_LEX_UNIT*)'

On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: > Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is > the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). Right. Implementing AnalyzeBranch will allow a bunch of block layout and branch optimizations to happen. > However I still wouldn'...

On 02/10/2010 01:31 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: > On 09/02/2010, at 3:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >> On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Keynes wrote: >> >>> Firstly, the BNE/BA pair should be reduced to a BE (I assume this is the responsibility of AnalyzeBranch and friends that you mention). &g...

...t version of R -in Windows- (ie 2.15.3 ), perhaps? Jose Wrap Up and Run 10k is back! Also, new for 2013 ? 2km intergenerational walks at selected venues. So recruit a buddy, dust off the trainers and beat the winter blues by signing up now: http://www.ageuk.org.uk/10k Milton Keynes | Oxford | Sheffield | Crystal Palace | Exeter | Harewood House, Leeds | Tatton Park, Cheshire | Southampton | Coventry Age UK Improving later life http://www.ageuk.org.uk ------------------------------- Age UK is a registered charity and company limited...

Hi all, I've put together some preliminary patches to add frontend support for the sparcv9-* subtarget (ie 64-bit SPARC), modelled on the corresponding x86-64 code - do these look reasonable for inclusion? This doesn't address the codegen side of things yet (isel falls over when trying to actually emit 64-bit code), but at least bitcode generation looks correct now. Tested on

..._ZNKSs5c_strEv U _ZNKSs6lengthEv I believe this is a bug in the version of `nm` your using, prob /usr/bin/nm . I recommend configuring your PATH differently and using the GCC from: http://pkg.auroraux.org/GCC/ ( Installs to /opt/gcc4 ) Cheers, Edward O'Callaghan. 2009/8/11 Nathan Keynes <Nathan.Keynes at sun.com>: > Hi all, > >   I've encountered a couple of minor build issues on Solaris that > have crept in since 2.5, fixes below: > >   1. In lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp, there is: > > // Check if building with -fPIC > #if defined(__PIC__)...

> I don't know anything about Solaris, but your paste doesn't actually > contain any errors, just warnings (unless I'm reading "ld: warning: > relocation error:" wrong). It might help to run make without -j until > it fails, and then use `make VERBOSE=1` to print the exact commands > it's running. Sorry. There was so much output I wasn't sure how much

On 11/12/2009, at 10:43 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hi, Chris > >> That is target independent code, so you should not put sparc specific changes there. It sounds like one of the sparc-specific target hooks is wrong. > Since sparc does not provide any hooks for operation of branches (e.g. > AnalyzeBranch and friends) it might be possible that generic codegen > code is

...> | @ageuk<http://twitter.com/ageukpa>campaigns Wrap Up and Run 10k is back! Also, new for 2013 – 2km intergenerational walks at selected venues. So recruit a buddy, dust off the trainers and beat the winter blues by signing up now: http://www.ageuk.org.uk/10k Milton Keynes | Oxford | Sheffield | Crystal Palace | Exeter | Harewood House, Leeds | Tatton Park, Cheshire | Southampton | Coventry Age UK Improving later life http://www.ageuk.org.uk ------------------------------- Age UK is a registered charity and company limited...

Currently the build systems sets ARCH based on the result of 'uname -m'. On a mixed 32/64 system (one with a 64-bit kernel and a 32-bit userspace) this will result in "x86_64" which is wrong. We'd like the ARCH variable to represent the userspace we're compiling in/for, not what the kernel happens to be. Does anyone know of a clean way to detect this sort of system

On 10/03/2009, at 1:25 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Currently the build systems sets ARCH based on the result of 'uname - > m'. > On a mixed 32/64 system (one with a 64-bit kernel and a 32-bit > userspace) this will result in "x86_64" which is wrong. > > We'd like the ARCH variable to represent the userspace we're compiling > in/for, not what the