Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "kernel06".
Did you mean:
kernel
2013 Jan 03
5
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
David,
I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue
is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step
compilation.
When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all
steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of
each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.
This difference is due to the fact that I'm running the test-suite using
LNT, while the build bots are runn...
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...13 12:05, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> David,
>
> I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue
> is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step
> compilation.
>
> When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all
> steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of
> each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.
>
> This difference is due to the fact that I'm running the test-suite using
> LNT, while...
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...;renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> David,
>
> I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue
> is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step
> compilation.
Thanks for the investigation.
> When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all
> steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of
> each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.
Sounds quite plausible.
> This difference is due to the fact that I'm running the test-suite...
2013 Jan 07
4
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...d,
> >
> > I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the
> issue
> > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi
> step
> > compilation.
>
> Thanks for the investigation.
>
> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all
> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options
> of
> > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.
>
> Sounds quite plausible.
>
> > This difference is due to the fact tha...
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...k on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the
>> > issue
>> > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi
>> > step
>> > compilation.
>>
>> Thanks for the investigation.
>>
>> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all
>> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options
>> > of
>> > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.
>>
>> Sounds quite plausible.
>>
>> > This...
2013 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...that the
> >> > issue
> >> > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi
> >> > step
> >> > compilation.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the investigation.
> >>
> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get
> all
> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults
> options
> >> > of
> >> > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.
> >>
> >> Sounds quite plau...
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...issue
>> >> > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi
>> >> > step
>> >> > compilation.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the investigation.
>> >>
>> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get
>> >> > all
>> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults
>> >> > options
>> >> > of
>> >> > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generate...
2013 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...e difference in the parameters between a single step and a
> multi
> >> >> > step
> >> >> > compilation.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for the investigation.
> >> >>
> >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get
> >> >> > all
> >> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults
> >> >> > options
> >> >> > of
> >> >> > each and how they interact is showing a...
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...p and a
>> >> >> > multi
>> >> >> > step
>> >> >> > compilation.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks for the investigation.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you
>> >> >> > get
>> >> >> > all
>> >> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults
>> >> >> > options
>> >> >> > of
>> >> &...
2013 Jan 07
1
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...> > multi
> >> >> >> > step
> >> >> >> > compilation.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks for the investigation.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you
> >> >> >> > get
> >> >> >> > all
> >> >> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults
> >> >> >> > options
> >> >> >> &g...