search for: kernel06

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "kernel06".

Did you mean: kernel
2013 Jan 03
5
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
David, I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step compilation. When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated. This difference is due to the fact that I'm running the test-suite using LNT, while the build bots are runn...
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...13 12:05, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > David, > > I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step > compilation. > > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated. > > This difference is due to the fact that I'm running the test-suite using > LNT, while...
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...;renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > David, > > I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step > compilation. Thanks for the investigation. > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated. Sounds quite plausible. > This difference is due to the fact that I'm running the test-suite...
2013 Jan 07
4
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...d, > > > > I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the > issue > > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi > step > > compilation. > > Thanks for the investigation. > > > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all > > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options > of > > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated. > > Sounds quite plausible. > > > This difference is due to the fact tha...
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...k on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the >> > issue >> > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi >> > step >> > compilation. >> >> Thanks for the investigation. >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options >> > of >> > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated. >> >> Sounds quite plausible. >> >> > This...
2013 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...that the > >> > issue > >> > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi > >> > step > >> > compilation. > >> > >> Thanks for the investigation. > >> > >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get > all > >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults > options > >> > of > >> > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated. > >> > >> Sounds quite plau...
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...issue >> >> > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi >> >> > step >> >> > compilation. >> >> >> >> Thanks for the investigation. >> >> >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get >> >> > all >> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults >> >> > options >> >> > of >> >> > each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generate...
2013 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...e difference in the parameters between a single step and a > multi > >> >> > step > >> >> > compilation. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for the investigation. > >> >> > >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get > >> >> > all > >> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults > >> >> > options > >> >> > of > >> >> > each and how they interact is showing a...
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...p and a >> >> >> > multi >> >> >> > step >> >> >> > compilation. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the investigation. >> >> >> >> >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you >> >> >> > get >> >> >> > all >> >> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults >> >> >> > options >> >> >> > of >> >> &...
2013 Jan 07
1
[LLVMdev] Test Suite - Livermore Loops
...> > multi > >> >> >> > step > >> >> >> > compilation. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks for the investigation. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you > >> >> >> > get > >> >> >> > all > >> >> >> > steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults > >> >> >> > options > >> >> >> &g...