search for: kenall

...e multiple correlation coeffcient for Kendalls Tau and spearmans roh and check if it is signifikant. unfortunately i cannot find a way to do that in R. any sugestions? thank you in advance -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-Correlation-coefficient-spearman-Kenall-tp2063314p2063314.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I need help to resolve this issue. I saw that Andrew put a patch by Antti to enable users without full admin access to join samba into an AD domain. I am playing with it and always get "Insufficient access". Using the same user, I can join a Windows box into the domain just fine. The user is a member of "domain users", but not "domain admins". I can use a

Hi, Can anyone provide any metrics on how effective this variable is on providing speed improvements on Intel systems? Is it beneficial for all Intel cards or only some? Is it all FUD? :) I'm thinking about this from a packagers perspective such that we can add support for seamless startup/integration. Thanks. Col.

On 14-03-13 21:24, Declan Kelly wrote: > No. I want the tightest possible compression, while remaining 100% > compatible with the subset that all known FLAC decoders can successfully > stream or play now in cars, Hi-Fi units, "MP3 players" and cell phones. > The out and out most widely supported lossless audio format could (and > should) have a better "bang for the

Hello Is it planned someday to implement additional higher (9-12) compression modes like in Flake? http://flake-enc.sourceforge.net/ It's not very important I think. Harddrive space isn't problem today. But it preserves other indepentent work done on Flac and give room for some extra albums on harddrive. I think development of flake is stopped. I plan to test my ~20 GB flac

?hel kenal p?eval (neljap?ev, 14. m?rts 2013 19:02:35) kirjutas Declan Kelly: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06:51PM -0400, benski at winamp.com wrote: > > Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I > > remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as > > well. I believe some of the techniques used in libflake were added to

Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as well. I believe some of the techniques used in libflake were added to libFLAC in 1.1.4. However, some of the improved compression in flake was due to options that are outside the FLAC 'subset', such as larger blocksize, greater number of

I don't think you guys should worry too much about messing up old decoders, but no matter what you choose to do FLAC MUST REMAIN LOSSLESS. On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:06 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >