Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "keithbsmiley".
2020 Jun 22
3
Phabricator Maintenance
...e looking back at the history of the
review difficult?)
- Dave
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:23 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:15 PM Keith Smiley <keithbsmiley at gmail.com<mailto:keithbsmiley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> FWIW GitHub's code review tools have improved significantly in the past few years. At this point with reviews and manual control over resolving / unresolving comments I think many previous complaints I'...
2020 Jun 19
2
Phabricator Maintenance
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:15 PM Keith Smiley <keithbsmiley at gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW GitHub's code review tools have improved significantly in the past
> few years. At this point with reviews and manual control over resolving /
> unresolving comments I think many previous complaints I've seen about
> GitHub vs Phabricator have bee...
2020 Jun 19
5
Phabricator Maintenance
...icult?)
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:23 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:15 PM Keith Smiley <keithbsmiley at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> FWIW GitHub's code review tools have improved significantly in the
>> past few years. At this point with reviews and manual control over
>> resolving / unresolving comments I think many previous complaints...
2020 Jun 22
1
Phabricator Maintenance
...>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:23 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:15 PM Keith Smiley <keithbsmiley at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> FWIW GitHub's code review tools have improved significantly in the
>>> past few years. At this point with reviews and manual control over
>>> resolving / unresolving comments I think many...
2020 Jun 19
3
Phabricator Maintenance
...main line?
(guessing that might still make looking back at the history of the
review difficult?)
- Dave
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:23 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:15 PM Keith Smiley <keithbsmiley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> FWIW GitHub's code review tools have improved significantly in the past few years. At this point with reviews and manual control over resolving / unresolving comments I think many previous complaints I've seen about GitHub vs Phabricator hav...
2020 Jun 23
3
Phabricator Maintenance
...ia llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:15 PM Keith Smiley
> <keithbsmiley at gmail.com <mailto:keithbsmiley at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> FWIW GitHub's code review tools have improved
> significantly in the past few years. At this point with
> reviews and manua...
2020 Jun 19
4
Phabricator Maintenance
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:56 AM Hubert Tong via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:32 PM Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Just my 2 cents here: we are working on enabling this as a part of
>> bugzilla migration as PRs and issues are very tied inside GitHub. Stay
>> tuned for