search for: kee

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS...

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS...

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses > bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS...

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > > >> array members annotated wi...

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > > >> array members annotated wi...

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > > >> array members annotated wi...

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > >> array members annotated with __counted_by can...

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > >> array members annotated with __counted_by can...

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming > >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible > >> array members annotated with __counted_by can...

Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible >> array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses...

Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible >> array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses...

Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming >> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible >> array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses...

Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kee...

Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kee...

Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig >> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Am 29.09.23 um 21:33 schrieb Kees Cook: >>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kee...

...nd with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by to structs that would benefit from the annotation. Since the element count member must be set before accessing the annotated flexible array member, some patches also move the member's initialization earlier. (These are noted in the individual patches.) -Kees [1] https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci Kees Cook (9): drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struc...

...nd with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by to structs that would benefit from the annotation. Since the element count member must be set before accessing the annotated flexible array member, some patches also move the member's initialization earlier. (These are noted in the individual patches.) -Kees [1] https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci Kees Cook (9): drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struc...

...nd with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by to structs that would benefit from the annotation. Since the element count member must be set before accessing the annotated flexible array member, some patches also move the member's initialization earlier. (These are noted in the individual patches.) -Kees [1] https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci Kees Cook (9): drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struc...

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > > > Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > &gt...

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 02.10.23 um 20:08 schrieb Kees Cook: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 08:01:57PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote: > > > Am 02.10.23 um 18:53 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:06:19AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:20?AM Christian K?nig > &gt...