Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "kbulgrien".
Did you mean:
bulgrien
2018 Sep 12
4
smbclient for SCO OpenServer 5.0.7
Looking back in the samba mailing list archives, I see not soancient requests
for samba on ancient SCO OpenServer systems.
Recently faced with a situation where a Windows Server upgrade to 2012 R2 and
broke an smbclient upload from a SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 system. Directory
listings and file deletions did not fail, but all upload attempts produced
empty files on the Windows server (this due,
2015 Jun 30
1
wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall
(Apologies for the potential duplicate post. My initial post had a
smashed subject line. This post only adds the subject and this note.)
I would like permission to edit this page. The changes I have in mind are:
1) It is not necessary to burn a CD/DVD to do a "headless" install in
cases where the installed system has a monitor, but for some reason
cannot support a graphical
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...e FAQ.
3) I am not sure if this came into play or not, but I have also noted that
xinetd does not always properly add new services with the traditional
"kill -HUP pid" procedure. I have found before that a reboot is
sometimes necessary.
--
Kevin R. Bulgrien, Engineer
Mailto:kbulgrien@vcsd.com
Vertex RSI, A TriPoint Global Company http://www.vcsd.com/
Controls & Structures Division
1915 Harrison Road Tel: 903-295-1480 x288
Longview, TX 75604-5438 Fax: 903-295-1479
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Peat [mail...
2015 Jun 30
0
c
I would like permission to edit this page. The changes I have in mind are:
1) It is not necessary to burn a CD/DVD to do a "headless" install in
cases where the installed system has a monitor, but for some reason
cannot support a graphical install directly. This can be caused by: a
server that has too little memory to run a graphical install, or running
the install in a virtual
2005 Apr 30
5
SPT vs. DPT Sanity Check (Samba rules)
Before wasting a lot of time going at this in the wrong list, I would like
to confirm whether my thinking is on or off base with respect to source
and destination ports.
Samba is being blocked by fw2loc even though I have accept rules
set up. I believe I can explain why, but I could be wrong.
I think that for some reason, samba is sourcing stuff on the commonly
used port 137, but trying to send