search for: kb3ien

...te ports was dangerous. Its not like we NEVER renumber networks.... I decided to implement this behaviour using a permitremote=HOST:PORT (unless anyone has a better suggestion) expect a patch when I get a Round Tuit. - -- _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | Robin-David Hammond %KB3IEN against HTML e-mail X | CCNA / \ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJM8bx9AAoJELbrs44SuiR0r24P/juiwhLEdSvkdXTUoWmDG5Cc A9V17fcsryyDq68aRyjSwgesaTX2ne2WRF22If30bvaFo...

...isconnecting (in 5 > mins). Why? > > Please help me... > > Regards, > ro0ot > > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > Robin-David Hammond KB3IEN www.aresnyc.org. --===============0492895792==--

Hi everyone, I''m controling the uplink traffic bandwidth between two ethernet linux computers, but it seems like even the download bandwidth gets limited then i''ve got trouble on that because my intention is  shaping the conection on an asymetric way (ADSL).  Lately, I''m going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worried and i''m not figuring out at all, the

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

I''m trying to setup some DNAT and the packets seem to be disappearing after the PREROUTING step. The packets are coming in eth2 (both LOG targets in iptables and tcpdump confirm this). They are then DNATed to an IP that should cause them to go out eth3. However I never see them go out that interface. I have tried putting LOG rules into the FORWARD chain with no success. I''m

Hi, my situation: One internet connection 256 kbps uplink/downlink, pretty stable speed, a Linux router with three NICs (one to ISP, one to DMZ and one with VLANs enabled to our LAN). Each of three VLANs (1, 10, 11) is a region for me; id 1 gets guaranteed 128 kbps, id 10 and 11 both get guaranteed 64 kbps (both uplink and downlink). Simple configuration. After I read relevant parts of lartc

I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL uses ATM as its transport. An ATM