Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "kathmann".
2006 Mar 02
0
RE: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13
...get an ethernet switch that works. At least they got the
>>routers right :)
>>
>>On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 08:13 -0800, Gary Richardson wrote:
>>
>>>You don't need switchport mode trunk when using switchport voice
>>>vlan..
>>>On 3/1/06, Nicholas Kathmann
>>><nicholas.kathmann@kathmannconsulting.com> wrote:
>>> Joao Pereira wrote:
>>> > Hello to all > I would like to know If some of you have
already
>>> configured
>>> an Cisco
>>> > IP Phone (7940 or 79...
2006 Mar 02
0
OT - Cisco IP Phone and PC in different VLANs(with802.1x)
...s. At least they got
the
>>> routers right :)
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 08:13 -0800, Gary Richardson wrote:
>>>
>>>> You don't need switchport mode trunk when using switchport voice
>>>> vlan..
>>>> On 3/1/06, Nicholas Kathmann
>>>> <nicholas.kathmann@kathmannconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>> Joao Pereira wrote:
>>>> > Hello to all > I would like to know If some of you have
>>>> already configured
>>>> an Cisco
>>>>...
2006 Mar 02
0
OT - Cisco IP Phone and PC in diferent VLANs(with 802.1x)
.... At least they got the
> >routers right :)
> >
> >On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 08:13 -0800, Gary Richardson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>You don't need switchport mode trunk when using switchport voice
> >>vlan..
> >>
> >>On 3/1/06, Nicholas Kathmann
> >><nicholas.kathmann@kathmannconsulting.com> wrote:
> >> Joao Pereira wrote:
> >> > Hello to all
> >> > I would like to know If some of you have already
configured
> >> an Cisco
> >> > IP Phon...
2006 Jun 09
2
H.264 and Motorola Ojo
Hi all,
I've just acquired a few Motorola OJO units, and am looking at testing them
out with Asterisk.
Having read the Ojo spec it seems they use an 'enhanced' version of h.264,
which I believe is supported to some extent under 1.4 (?). Amongst other
things, it seems that the Ojo allows for custom frame rates and picture
sizes, outside the standard implementation of H.264(?)
Does
2006 Mar 01
2
OT - Cisco IP Phone and PC in diferent VLANs (with 802.1x)
Hello to all
I would like to know If some of you have already configured an Cisco IP
Phone (7940 or 7960) to work in a different VLAN than the PC that is
connected through the phone switch?
I know that this can be done with the Skinny firmware, but I dont if it
works with the SIP firmware.
The Cisco technical staff told me that these phones dont support 802.1x
but can work as pass-through.
2006 Feb 23
4
IAXModem/Hylafax problem
I think I'm very close to getting IAXModem and Hylafax going, but my
current inbound hylafax logs show this:
Feb 23 10:09:37.98: [ 3638]: MODEM <Empty line>
Feb 23 10:09:37.98: [ 3638]: MODEM TIMEOUT: waiting for v.21 carrier
Two questions -
1) Does anyone know what step I missed here? (I.e. please help!)
2) Is there a document I should be working off of? Google doesn't seem
to
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
...oehlerundbracht/>
**
Amtsgericht Oldenburg, Handelsregister HRA 202553
Pers?nlich haftende Gesellschafterin: K?hler + Bracht Beteiligungsges mbH,
Sitz: Rastede, Registergericht: Oldenburg, Handelsregister HRB 205104
Gesch?ftsf?hrer der K?hler + Bracht Beteiligungsges mbH: Tina K?hler und Maria Kathmann
Dieses Dokument ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Die Weitergabe sowie
Vervielf?ltigung, Verwertung und Mitteilung seines Inhalts ist nur mit unserer ausdr?cklichen Genehmigung gestattet.
Alle Rechte vorbehalten, insbesondere f?r den Fall der Schutzrechtsanmeldung.
This document has to be treated co...
2006 Apr 13
13
Digium cards, so disappointing !
I am so fed up with Digium cards. My company first owned a TE410P,
I installed it in a Dell server and "enjoyed" its instability (we
bought it months before Digium warned about the incompatibility
issues). Then we switched to a TE411P for the hardware echo
cancellation. Now we want to receive fax (< 20/day) on it and
guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Hello Thomas,
we've done the exact same thing: we have a few nextcloud instances bound
to Samba (now 4.20, but 4.19 worked too).
You HAVE to use "ldaps://<FQDN>" in the "Host" field and "636" in the
"Port" field.
For the certificates issues: either you create a CA, create the samba
certificates and add this CA to the trusted certificate