search for: kasp

...^^^^^^ AND 2) tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip tos 0x10 0xff flowid 1:10 ^^^^^^^ Why they aren''t equal? Is there some rules to set prio for each of them? -- Best regards, kasp mailto:waters@inbox.lv _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...d = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 120ms, Maximum = 120ms, Average = 120ms If I don''t use any rules, 65500 byte pings are about ~10ms Any filters are slowing large pings for 10 times!!! What can I do to tune it up? -- Best regards, kasp mailto:waters@inbox.lv _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi! There is one thing I can''t do. In my country we have to pay for "foreign" internet. Local internet is cheap and fast, but foreign is slow and expensive. So I want do following: mark every packet with iptables, where --set-mark 1 for foreign internet, but --set-mark 2 for local internet next when I got all traffic marking, I need to assign traffic to users so I make

...n) allowed values of ncp, i.e. in this case 35,36 and 37 is done and precision is checked, whereas calculation for the rest may be completely incorrect? Or was there any update of code (in pnt.c ?), allowing calculation of pt with higher ncp, not followed by documentation update? Thank you, Nikola Kasp??kov?

...ff at 8 flowid 1:11 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 match u8 0x10 0xff at nexthdr+13 protocol tcp flowid 1:11 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 match u8 0x10 0xff at nexthdr+13 flowid 1:11 All I need is to match TTL=64 and TTL=128, of course with iproute :) Any ideas? Kaspars Advertisement: Atrodiet savu celojumu seit! http://travel.inbox.lv