search for: karthikvenkatesh

...> Date : Oct 24, 2012 05:01 (GMT+09:00) Title : Re: [LLVMdev] Clang fails to compile template with dependendent Non type template parameter. Questions about Clang should be directed to cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu, not to llvmdev at . This issue is fixed in r166496. On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:33 AM, KARTHIKVENKATESH BHAT wrote: > Hi All, > I'm trying to compile the following code on clang- > > template class X {}; > template struct Y { > static const unsigned int dim = 1 ; > template X::dim> f(); > }; > > template template > X::dim> Y::f() { return X(); } > &g...

Hi All, I compiled the following code on my linux PC using clang with PIE option- struct struct4 {char a; char b; char c; char d; }; struct struct4 foo4 = {'a','2','c','4'}; struct struct4 fun4() { return foo4; } int main() { fun4(); return 0; } > clang -g -fPIE structs.c In GDB session when i call p/c fun4() i get something like below- (gdb) p/c

Hi All, I'm trying to compile the following code on clang- template <int dim> class X {}; template <class T> struct Y { static const unsigned int dim = 1 ; template <class U> X<Y<T>::dim> f(); }; template <class T> template <class U> X<Y<T>::dim> Y<T>::f() { return X<dim>(); } int main() { Y<int>().f<int>();

Hi All, I'm trying to compile the attached code(gdb11531.c) with latest clang with -O0 on ARM. Clang seems to be reordering the instructions in case of constant nodes(for ARM) even when O0 is specified resulting in few wrong information when debugging through GDB. I had few queries,would be great if someone could clarify the same - In the given assembly code, the instructions where constant