search for: karels

Hello, it looks like I do have infinite loop in llc on linux/armv7 platform somewhere in llvm::SmallVectorImpl. Two backtraces obtained with 10 seconds delay are: 0x0099be14 in llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::SDNode*>::setEnd (this=0x7ee90b38, P=0x5c06988) at /export/home/karel/vcs/llvm-head/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:103 103 void setEnd(T *P) { this->EndX = P; }

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: > Hello, > > it looks like I do have infinite loop in llc on linux/armv7 platform > somewhere in llvm::SmallVectorImpl. Two backtraces obtained with 10 > seconds delay are: > > 0x0099be14 in llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::SDNode*>::setEnd > (this=0x7ee90b38, P=0x5c06988)

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:47:39PM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote: > ... > > changing from: <driver name='file'/> to: <driver name='tap2'/> makes > the domain start without QEMU. > > However I see much better performance with QEMU (close to dom0, > tested using simple dd writes) than with tap2 driver. Is that > expected? > How did you measure

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 01:35:48AM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote: > Comparing simple dd bs=1M count=10000 on dom0 vs domU. Qemu driver > is achieving pretty much the same like dom0. > So you're measuring buffered speed. Try measuring non-buffered (iflag=direct or oflag=direct, depending if you're reading or writing). -- Pasi > Thanks > -- > Karel > > On 7.9.2015

Hi Jim and Eric! thanks a lot for your fantastically fast reply. I'm going to update and will report tomorrow when all the building is done. Thanks! Karel On 08/29/11 11:36 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Hi Karel, > > Mind trying again with current top of tree? Owen's fixed a few things today that were manifesting with that error. > > -Jim > > On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:33

I could delete all records of this server that no longer exists no problem even record type NS I only have these two that there has been no way to erase any other ideas thanks samba-tool dns delete zdtoe-02.dtoe.etecsa.cu dtoe.etecsa.cu _msdcs\010CNF:946b89d3-b07b-4f43-a6b9-0de3bf3f3a10.dtoe.etecsa.cu. NS zdtoe-01.dtoe.etecsa.cu -U administrator GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego'

Hi, spot on! On 6.9.2015 12:56, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 09:08:50AM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote: >> Hi, after migrating to libvirt/libxl according to: >> > > Hi, > >> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart/Xen4Libvirt >> >> I've noticed that my Xen PV domains are being launched by >> qemu-system-i386 running

Hi Tim, On 01/ 8/14 10:24 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > Hi Karel, > >> I've observed the same issue with LLVM 3.4 as distributed by Ubuntu 13.10 >> and with LLVM HEAD compiled on January 6. I'm able to provide the byte-code >> file which results in this issue, but would first like to know if this is a >> known issue in AArch64 target support or if I shall submit

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185 Bug ID: 1185 Summary: counter flag proposal for sets and maps Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hello, I've compiled today's LLVM on ARM/Linux machine and attempted to use our GHC/ARM port (which is using LLVM as a backend for generating machine code) with it but I've failed in compiling GHC alone as LLVM fails on me with following message: llc: /export/home/karel/vcs/llvm-ghc-arm/lib/CodeGen/MachineInstr.cpp:612: void llvm::MachineInstr::addOperand(const

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127 Bug ID: 1127 Summary: running nft command creates lag for forwarded packets Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1417 Bug ID: 1417 Summary: mapping to adjacent ranges is causing error in kernel 5.6, kernel 5.5 works fine Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

On 06/24/11 06:53 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Karel Gardas<karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote: >> My question is if it is a known bug or unknown in which case where to >> report it and if also include compiled *.bc file or not. > > Haven't seen it before... see > http://llvm.org/docs/HowToSubmitABug.html , and please do include the

Hello, I'm trying to find myself, but anyway, I'm curious what's the recommended GNU C++ version for LLVM compilation on ARM/Linux platform? I'm using various version of Ubuntu and so far the best compiler I found was 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9)[1]. With this and with just -O1 as optimize option I've been able to get to 1 failing testcase. Other tested were 4.4.3 and

I need to delete the DNS record and I could not have any idea something that is going bad root at zdtoe-02:~# dig axfr dtoe.etecsa.cu |grep zdtoe-01 *_msdcs\010CNF:946b89d3-b07b-4f43-a6b9-0de3bf3f3a10.dtoe.etecsa.cu. 900 IN NS zdtoe-01.dtoe.etecsa.cu.* *_msdcs\010CNF:4b642bd5-765f-4b16-93ce-3921b46ce220.dtoe.etecsa.cu. 900 IN NS zdtoe-01.dtoe.etecsa.cu. *root at zdtoe-02:~#*samba-tool dns

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1382 Bug ID: 1382 Summary: nftables.py cmd leaking memory when ruleset contain mapping ip length to range with high limit 65535 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major

Hello Cameron, thanks a lot for your fast answer, which just makes me curious if making ARM tailcalls on par with x86 in the future is on some of the development plans already? If not, then what do you think is the complexity of such work? Thanks! Karel On 06/17/11 10:41 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > They work pretty well now, at least on Thumb2 / Darwin. It is still fairly conservative

Good test, non-buffered dom0 dd write speed is similar with tap2. I'll likely stay with the QEMU backend. Are there any best practises regarding security, at least if QEMU can operate under non-root account? Cheers -- Karel On 12.9.2015 10:51, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 01:35:48AM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote: >> Comparing simple dd bs=1M count=10000 on dom0

Hi Karel, Mind trying again with current top of tree? Owen's fixed a few things today that were manifesting with that error. -Jim On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: > Hello, > > I've compiled today's LLVM on ARM/Linux machine and attempted to use our GHC/ARM port (which is using LLVM as a backend for generating machine code) with it but I've failed in

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1184 Bug ID: 1184 Summary: disable implicit concatenating of elements of sets with flag interval Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: