Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "karahalio".
Did you mean:
karahalios
2009 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
...ck-end for a fictitious target machine - something
similar to "Porting GCC for Dunces" (http://ftp.axis.se/pub/users/hp/pgccfd/pgccfd.pdf
). Also a pre-made "Dummy" back-end that had some basic instructions
would also go a long way in helping someone write a back-end.
Alex Karahalios
On Apr 11, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Greg McGary wrote:
> As we've already seen, David Chisnall prefers hacking LLVM over GCC
> (see http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In
> contrast, every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to
> prevent me f...
2009 Apr 12
9
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
As we've already seen, David Chisnall prefers hacking LLVM over GCC (see
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In contrast,
every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to
prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out."
I'm sorry to report that so-far I have had the opposite experience.
Some years ago, I ported binutils (via CGEN) and GCC to an
2009 Apr 13
1
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
Hello, Alex
> for generating C++ records. I was hoping for something that would allow me
> to specify my target machine (more inline with what GCC does) and then just
> stand back and watch the target code be generated. I guess a deeper
> understanding of Target classes is mandatory before proceeding to use
> TableGen.
That's true. TableGen can automate many important cases,
2009 Jul 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
Hi Sanjiv,
Assuming that that support for Ada in LLVM is complete, I would look
to see if there is something that is done there. Ada provides two
pragmas (Interrupt_Handler & Attach_Handler) which allow you to both
statically and dynamically attach interrupts to procedures.
Alex Karahalios
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:07 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com
> wrote:
> Apparently, there is no explicit support for ISRs in the llvm
> framework. I could not find a matching attribute that can be used
> to mark a function as an ISR, whi...
2009 Jul 21
7
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
Hi,
Apparently, there is no explicit support for ISRs in the llvm framework. I could not find a matching attribute that can be used to mark a function as an ISR, which codegen and optimizer can use accordingly. ISRs aren't called explicity from any function, so currently the optimizer deletes them. We are planning to introduce a new "interrupt" attribute (to be modeled similiar to