search for: kaewkasi

...Chanwit On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 23:52, nicolas geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chanwit, > Thanks for the patch! Could you change it to detect the ant executable > instead of the ANT_HOME variable? > Nicolas > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Please find in the attachment a patch for configure.ac to detect >> ANT_HOME, when running configure --with-gc=mmtk. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chanwit >> >> ______________________________...

Hi, Please find in the attachment a patch for configure.ac to detect ANT_HOME, when running configure --with-gc=mmtk. Cheers, Chanwit -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ant_home_ac.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 696 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100713/561e7840/attachment.bin>

Hi Chanwit, Thanks for the patch! Could you change it to detect the ant executable instead of the ANT_HOME variable? Nicolas On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please find in the attachment a patch for configure.ac to detect > ANT_HOME, when running configure --with-gc=mmtk. > > Cheers, > > Chanwit > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing l...

Latest version of vmkit should now build fine with latest llvm. Nicolas On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, nicolas geoffray < nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > The one that I have currently that works with vmkit is 107120. > > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello Nicolas, >> >> Thank you for quick reply. >> Is LLVM revision 107641 a good one to build with latest VMKIT? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chanwit >> >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 00:06, nicolas geoffray &...

Hi Chanwit, What problems did you have for compiling the latest revision? Could you give me a log? Thanks, Nicolas On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, Nicolas. > But I still have no luck compiling the latest revision. However, > vmkit-0.27 is compiled and running fine on my machine. > > Thanks, > > Chanwit > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 05:18, nicolas geoffray > <nicol...

...uld now build fine with latest llvm. > Nicolas > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, nicolas geoffray > <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The one that I have currently that works with vmkit is 107120. >> >> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Nicolas, >>> >>> Thank you for quick reply. >>> Is LLVM revision 107641 a good one to build with latest VMKIT? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Chanwit >>> &gt...

The one that I have currently that works with vmkit is 107120. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Nicolas, > > Thank you for quick reply. > Is LLVM revision 107641 a good one to build with latest VMKIT? > > Thanks, > > Chanwit > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 00:06, nicolas geoffray > <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> w...

Hello Nicolas, Thank you for quick reply. Is LLVM revision 107641 a good one to build with latest VMKIT? Thanks, Chanwit On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 00:06, nicolas geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > Yes, there was a change in the LLVM CallInst API, and I haven't updated > vmkit yet. It should be fixed real soon. > Cheers, > Nicolas > > On Wed,

Hi all, Just a quick question. Is there any way to reduce the startup time of J3? Thanks, Chanwit