search for: kaelyn

...-o /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.bc opt -f -O2 /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.bc -o /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.bc-GHASUE llc -O2 /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.bc-GHASUE -o /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.s as /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.s -o /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.o llvm-ld -native -disable-internalize /tmp/llvm_OoIRlO/test.o -o a.out Cheers, Kaelyn -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-opt-ll.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 647 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110215/0680220b/attachment.bin>

...t "opt" seems too generic in comparison. Maybe something like "stdopt" (or even the longer "balancedopt") since it corresponds to -O2 and is intended to represent a good optimization level for most cases with a balance of compile time, space, and runtime efficiency. - Kaelyn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130114/b5c00d3f/attachment.html>

Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> writes: > minsizeopt > sizeopt > quickopt > opt > maxopt I prefer being consistent and putting "opt" at the end. I would still like something other than "opt" for the fourth one. "opt" seems too generic given the other levels. -David

Without this patch, opt is never called for llvm-assembly (.ll) files when "-opt" is passed to llvmc: $ llvmc -clang -v test.ll llc -f -O2 test.ll -o /tmp/llvm_gvO2nK/test.s as /tmp/llvm_gvO2nK/test.s -o /tmp/llvm_gvO2nK/test.o llvm-ld -native -disable-internalize /tmp/llvm_gvO2nK/test.o -o a.out $ llvmc -clang -opt -v test.ll llc -f -O2 test.ll -o /tmp/llvm_2xiL86/test.s as

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kaelyn Uhrain <rikka at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:30 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > >> Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> writes: >> >> > minsizeopt >> > sizeopt >> > quickopt >> > opt >> > maxopt...

...lt; dgregor at apple.com>, Erik Eckstein <eeckstein at apple.com>, Evgeniy Stepanov < eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com>, Fiona Glaser <escha at apple.com>, Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov>, Ivan Krasin <krasin at chromium.org>, Jingyue Wu < jingyue at google.com>, Kaelyn Takata <rikka at google.com>, Kostya Serebryany < kcc at google.com>, Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com>, Reid Kleckner < rnk at google.com>, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>, Sanjay Patel < spatel at rotateright.com>, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com&...

Hello Everyone We're looking right now for web interface to git mirrors of main LLVM repo. What should be used? Gitweb? cgit? Gitalist? If you have some success stories to share - please let us know. If possible, we'd prefer something perl'ish or python'ish :) Thanks! -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > If I understand the attributes correctly, they would be function-level > attributes applied to IR functions, correct? I'm curious what the > semantics would be for cross-function optimization. For example, consider > a function "foo" defined with maxopt and a function