Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "k3wl".
Did you mean:
g3wl
2015 Dec 09
0
wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]
...uch work for, say, the fedora development team to
put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific
Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major
changes, and see the feedback....
Nahhh, who cares whether end users are happy, they'll just do what is
K3wl, never mind if it's appropriate, or overly complicated....
mark
2015 Dec 18
0
google chrome future / centos 7
...*any* logfile (or configuration file, for that
matter) to be XML. Logs - if your machine is borked, cat or more may work,
when no other way to view it does. Configuration... XML is for GUI. If the
GUI's already hiding stuff, why not have it write out to *text* files?
Just because something is K3WL and NEW!!! doesn't mean you *have* to use
it. That there's a screw, don't use your hammer on it.
mark
2002 Feb 04
0
ObSheesh: Sheesh
...R-R" <stuart@bh90210.net> writes:
[...]
> I really did not mean to insult anyone, just I like choice too,
> and I want to see that choice in RH distributions also.
I guess we're just circling around the main issue here: it's great you
really like Reiser and think it's k3wl or whatever, but this isn't the
place to come tell us about it.
If you really want Red Hat to put Reiser in their installer (and you're
not really a troll) you can:
a) patch the installer yourself and upload your patches to bugzilla, or,
b) file a bugzilla request by itself and ask the...
2015 Dec 18
4
google chrome future / centos 7
On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> <sarcasm>
>> I guess we all are divided into two categories
>>
>> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my
>> choice, the hell with that crap (and google itself).
>>
>> 2. If google
2015 Dec 09
5
wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
> hundreds of contributors introduces something that in my opinion may
> impact a server installation. ....
>
> Am I