search for: jvidrin

...buffer45.patch -- For FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE and earlier Currently, I don't believe that this bug is actually exploitable for code execution on FreeBSD, but I reserve the right to be wrong :-) Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se -------------- next part -------------- Index: crypto/openssh/buffer.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/crypto/openssh/buffer.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1.2.3 diff -c -c -r1.1.1.1.2.3 buff...

What does mean this bizarre msgid? maillog: Mar 31 19:31:15 cu sm-mta[5352]: h2VFVEGS005352: from=<nb@sindbad.ru>, size=1737, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAfp4Fa2ShPE2u4pP/QpPDIMKAAAAQAAAAj+zb4Isbuk+tYEPVF9Vf, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=wg.pu.ru [193.124.85.219] -- Nikolaj I. Potanin, SA http://www.drweb.ru ID

In FreeBSD 5.x only telnet/telnetd works 'out of box' with kerberos. Why ftp/ftpd, ssh/sshd and cvs do not support kerberos ? Thanks!

This affects only 3.7p1 and 3.7.1p1. The advice to leave PAM disabled is far from heartening, nor is the semi-lame blaming the PAM spec for implementation bugs. I happen to like OPIE for remote access. Subject: Portable OpenSSH Security Advisory: sshpam.adv This document can be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/sshpam.adv 1. Versions affected: Portable OpenSSH versions 3.7p1

...eeBSD 4.7-RELEASE or specified WANT_LUKEMFTP when building FreeBSD from source, you should not have lukemftpd installed. Even in FreeBSD 4.7, lukemftpd was installed but not enabled. More details will be available in a FreeBSD advisory to follow. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org

...EASE. Fixes for the security branches will be backported and incorporated over the next week. Don't expect to see a security advisory until most or all of the commits have been made. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se

Hi Jacques, list, On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:09:18AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/../include -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf

...fixed version, OpenSSL 0.9.7c, was imported into -CURRENT yesterday, and will be MFC'd to -STABLE today, but it will be a bit longer to backport fixes for the security branches. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se

In http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402260743.IAA18903 it seems RELENG_4 is vulnerable. Is there any work around to a system that has to have ports open ? Version: 1 2/18/2004@03:47:29 GMT >Initial report > <<https://ialert.idefense.com/KODetails.jhtml?irId=207650>https://ialert.idefense.com/KODetails.jhtml?irId=207650; >ID#207650: >FreeBSD Memory Buffer

Any reason why portaudit and its associated infrastructure was not announced to this list or security-notifications? I recently discovered it, and discovered the feature was added to bsd.port.mk in the beginning of feburary. Seeing as the security officer apparently (without announcement) no longer issues security notices (SNs) for ports, I am assuming that portaudit has replaced SNs entirely,

...usr/src # patch -p1 < /path/to/patch # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail # make obj && make depend && make && make install Official advisory will go out later today. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se

...usr/src # patch -p1 < /path/to/patch # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail # make obj && make depend && make && make install Official advisory will go out later today. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se

Hello, The current png-1.2.5_4 port has no more vulnerability. It has been corrected by ache@FreeBSD.org yesterday. But when i try to install the updated port to remplace the vulnerable one this is what i am told : # make install ===> png-1.2.5_4 has known vulnerabilities: >> libpng denial-of-service. Reference:

...routed to the Security Officer. I imagine this will have some significant impact: there must be many references to security@freebsd.org as a public list out there. So, I thought I'd air the issue here before sending any request to postmaster@. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org

It seems (at least for me) the patches on ftp.freebsd.org are out of date for the 03:12 security advisory (openssh). ftp2.freebsd.org has them fine. I'm wondering if this is a mirror issue or perhaps round-robin DNS problem? What compounds the issue is that right now the old openssh 3.7 patches are there (on ftp.freebsd.org), but not the 3.7.1 patches (which can be found on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Single byte buffer overflow in realpath(3) Category: core Module: libc Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:18.openssl Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: OpenSSL vulnerabilities in ASN.1 parsing Category: crypto Module: openssl Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: many out-of-sequence TCP packets denial-of-service Category: core Module: kernel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:07.sendmail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: a second sendmail header parsing buffer overflow Category: contrib Module:

In regards to FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr, does anyone know which static binaries or tools under /bin or /sbin actually use that problem code? The recent XDR fixes the xdrmem_getlong_aligned(), xdrmem_putlong_aligned(), xdrmem_getlong_unaligned(), xdrmem_putlong_unaligned(), xdrmem_getbytes(), and/or xdrmem_putbytes() functions, but it is difficult to know what uses these (going backwards manually).