search for: justman

...I needed to get a machine running since the machine I was replacing, a Sun Ultra 5 running Post.Office, had dying hard drives. Now, I'm actually sitting down and adapting it as a module and am having trouble getting it to work. The code tarball itself can be picked up here: http://www.ian-justman.com/code/dovecot/password_scheme_po_smd5.tar.gz Before I continued, I made sure that a system-level account worked: # telnet <server IP> 110 Trying <server IP>... Connected to <server IP>. Escape character is '^]'. +OK Dovecot ready. user <username> +OK pass <pa...

...t; break apart the value stored in a database a bit differently than other salted values (it's using salted MD5 values a bit differently than normal). The password format from a Post.Office server, but apparently, Netscape Messaging Server uses this same format. Thanks! --Ian. -- Ian R. Justman UNIX hacker. Anime fan. Any questions? ianj (at) ian-justman.com

...have a Dovecot build tree already (so I can use Dovecot's function library)? 2. Is there good documentation for Dovecot's plugin API? I need it so I can figure out how to write the parts which the main program call so then the code can be used as a plugin. Thanks! --Ian. -- Ian R. Justman UNIX hacker. Anime fan. Any questions? ianj (at) ian-justman.com

...Netscape's mailserver offering from the day also supports this scheme. There's code out there that was incorporated into OpenLDAP a while back which can read this scheme, but I need to use MySQL as a source for this. Thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer. --Ian. -- Ian R. Justman UNIX hacker. Anime fan. Any questions? ianj (at) ian-justman.com

Hi, all. I know that there's no official Dovecot 1.0-stable .deb, given Timo's recommendations. However, does anyone have even an "unofficial" deb of it for, say, Sarge? I want to use 1.0's ability to use both mbox and maildir; the latter is very helpful for dealing with mailing lists. Thanks in advance for any help. --Ian.

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > >> It even recently included a POP server. What's the reasoning there? > >Someone wanted it so it'd be easy to run both POP3 and IMAP servers > >without having to configure them twice. I don't see any harm in it > >anyway, it took only few hours to write, it's optional and doesn't take >

Hi, all. Just been testing out the latest "CVS" (in quotes because I'm rsyncing the source tree) versions of Dovecot lately. Tested having Pine on the machine on which Dovecot was running, talking IMAP, as well as another Pine instance, this time from my Windows machine over the wire. Things seem to be working wonderfully. Deleted a message using one instance, then refreshed the

Hi, all. I've been so impressed with Dovecot, I'm in the process of moving my mail over to it. In fact, one of my mailboxes got SO huge, it'll likely literally take more than a day to move it all over (in excess of 19,000 mails, about 140 megabytes). So far, the IMAP server shows absolutely no sign of crapping out yet. It should also be noted that I'm moving all this mail

...arrowheaded line. It should also be noted that I used the standard RSARef 2.0 code with and without the modulus bug patch, and RSARef 1.0 (from PGP 2.6.2). All yielded identical results. Any suggestions? Please let me know if you need anything further. Thanks in advance. --Ian. ----- Ian R. Justman Postmaster, System Administrator, ChocoboNet ianj at chocobo.org (home) ianj at calweb.com (work) NIC handle: IJ12 ICQ UIN# 14925819 UNIX system administrator by trade "An upset Windows NT administrator should be laughed at. An upset UNIX administrator should be deeply fe...

Hello, Is there available to create ssh recovery console except vnc console, that is default by libvirt. For example connect to kvm at host:2220 and go to first console For example like here <serial type="tcp"> <source mode="bind" host="127.0.0.1" service="2445"/> <protocol type="telnet"/> <target

Hi, all. I have been playing with the notion of migrating some of my folders to maildir because it's a lot easier to manage that way from a reader standpoint. The big question I have is how do I maintain message ordering in each folder? When I use a mail program to do the migration from mbox to maildir, selecting "order received ascending", it works nicely, but one very small

Hi, all. At home, I have a mailbox where mbox is the default (for inbox and some smaller mailboxes) and all my lists are in a Maildir format. I'm building a mailstore server at work where I want to use Maildir as the default mailstore, but I want to keep mbox on the side to aid in archiving messages. My configs are as follows for mail location and namespaces: Home: mail_location =

Timo Sirainen wrote: > Yes, it's been in todo for some time now. mbox support would likely be > read-only, read-write would require recreating the whole .gz file on > updates. Actually, I wouldn't mind seeing something like this so I can compress up my old mail and perhaps store them on CD, for example. I tend to archive mailing list traffic by month (which I store in mbox

Hi, all. On a lark, I have gotten Asterisk 1.0.2 (from Debian testing) up and running, but I have found one problem when I try to use it with Free World Dialup: Dialing doesn't work properly. I have everything else working; it receives calls, ringing my phone and everything, but when I try to dial using the configs found on FWD's site for Asterisk at this URL:

I have a network with 1 Linux box (host), 2 Win98 machines, and 1 WinXPHome machine. There is a Deskjet attached to the Linux box, and an HPLJ Postscript attached to one of the PCs. Until recently I was running RH7.1 with Samba 2.x and all computers could print to both printers (which, obviously, were shared). I have recently rebuilt the LInux box, and in the process installed Fedora, with Samba

Tried sending this message with the original topic On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > Hi, Ian. Cross-posting discussions like this is usually not appreciated > by those who subscribe to both foras, so I'll limit it to the Dovecot > list. Mea culpa. That was an inadvertent mess-up on my part; I did not see the headers, usually going by the list's reply-to