search for: justaguy

I've got a Samba member server as part of a Windows NT domain. User accounts have the same name in both domain. I was having all sorts of trouble when winbindd was running with wierd groups showing up. I happened to screw up the winbindd configuration without noticing causing it to crash, but I ran snmd and nmbd anyway and suddenly everything started working perfectly. The docs say you

...ve a user called Administrator. I guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for that. Thanks for your help, Greg On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:09?AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:14:52 -0400 > Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > > > Hey Rowland, > > > > Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to > > do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator > > account instead? > > > > The whole idea behind the user map on...

Dear All, Sorry if this question has been posted before but there's no enough answer to solved my problem and I'm going crazy because of it....:( I'm currently installed Samba-2.2.8a as logon server on My FreeBSD 5.0. For Win 9.X client there's no problem at all. But when I tried to joining W2K client into samba domain it's shown an error message such as : "the

...l look for that. > > > > Thanks for your help, > > Greg > > > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:09?AM Rowland Penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:14:52 -0400 > > > Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Rowland, > > > > > > > > Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to > > > > do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator > > > > account instea...

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:35:14 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a > linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials > come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I > guess I must have a user with RID...

On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:14:52 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to > do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator > account instead? > The whole idea behind the user map on a Unix domain member is to map the Domai...

...have a > user with RID 500 though, I'll look for that. > > Thanks for your help, > Greg > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:09?AM Rowland Penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:14:52 -0400 > > Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > > > > > Hey Rowland, > > > > > > Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to > > > do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator > > > account instead? > > > > > &g...

I'm trying to map my LDAP groups to Windows Groups, but I'm not having any luck. Here is a group I'm trying to map: dn: cn=dom_admin,ou=Groups,dc=wdselab objectClass: sambaGroupMapping objectClass: posixGroup gidNumber: 1000 cn: dom_admin memberUid: dom_admin description: Domain Admininistrators Group sambaSID: S-1-5-21-835892245-73647866-3919785651-512 sambaGroupType: 2 but when I

Ok, here is the problem. Samba is working, I can access it from a account I created from a windows XP machine. So that is good. But I can?t get swat to work when I go to my browser windows explorer and go to http://192.168.1.125 <http://192.168.1.125/> :901 (which is my static IP address for the machine). Of course with out port 901. But nothing happens when I try to open it. I do have my

Hey Rowland, Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator account instead? Thanks, Greg On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:30?PM Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:07:56 -0400 > Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi,

This may or may not be relevant to Samba -- hiding files, permissions, etc. I have half a dozen Windows XP video editing workstations all accessing the same data on my Linux Box. Each video editing worstation ideally would like to create it's own index of the video files in the shared directory. The video editing program stores the index data in a file that it HAS to write to the same

...fine, I can ping my workstation from > my server by name, etc. > > I found this post, which seems to find the source of the problem: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-April/083081.html > Quoting: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: >>> Hi Amitay, >>> >>> I think I may have figured this out. My AD started out as a 2003 SBS >>> system so the schemas are a bit different. Looking in the rpcdce code >>> for DNS I see that dnsserver_init_serverinfo >>> (rpc_server...

do I somehow have to add RID's? [root@linserv2 sbin]# ldapsearch -x -h localhost -b "o=Mullen,c=US" '(cn=Domain Admins)' version: 2 # # filter: (cn=Domain Admins) # requesting: ALL # # Domain Admins, Groups, Mullen, US dn: cn=Domain Admins,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 512 cn: Domain Admins memberUid:

Hi all, I have been working on a multi-domain network (2 of them) with one domain being controlled by Samba/Openldap config and the other a standard Win2k AD. I have had success getting all computers on the Samba domain to see the Win2k controller via the Network browser but it does not seem to be working the other way around. My network config is split up into two separate VLANs using an

...g the command ./smbclient -NL localhost I get load_client_codepage: filename /opt/local/samba/lib/codepages/codepage.850 does not exist. Should I have the file stated in the message? If so, how do I create it correctly. Thanks, Theo Theo Pope Sandia National Laboratories Return-Path: <greg@justaguy.ca> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from justaguy.ca (HSE-MTL-ppp72073.qc.sympatico.ca [64.229.199.136]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBBD4544; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by justaguy.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2)...

Hi Rowland, I wanted to try the internal DNS server because the guys have put a lot of work into it and it seems to mostly work. I have used samba 4 with bind in the past though and that does work. Are you using bind or bind DLZ with DHCP? Thanks, Greg On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 18:27 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/02/15 18:15, G?nter Kukkukk wrote: > > Am 27.02.2015 um 17:55

Hi, I used to build samba regularly but it's been a couple of years. I'm trying to fix an issue with samba stock 4.10.16 on Cent7 by building latest and seeing if it behaves the same but it looks like waf is not doing what's expected. Simple question: should this work or is cent7 now too old and missing stuff? Thanks, Greg -- Greg Dickie just a guy 514-983-5400

Hi, Sorry in advance if this is a FAQ but I have not been watching the list for a while. I have a customer who is foolish enough to want to use windows 7 so I updated them to a samba 3.4.3 PDC and successfully joined the domain however domain users cannot log in due to trust relationship failure. I've seen postings that look related that seem to have been fixed by moving to 3.3.6 but

Hi, I have site running 4.11.0 with internal DNS and we want to turn on DNS scavenging. Looking at the timestamps in DNS MMC they are all over the place and trying to update the timestamp gives a "The record does not exist" error. My question is whether this is supposed to work and whether there is a way to manipulate that data on the command line with samba-tool etc? As a follow-up,

Hi, Today I'm trying to debug a problem on samba 3.5.4 where a domain member server is having trouble mapping UIDs to SIDs. I must admit I never really looked at this before as everything seemed to "just work". Today I discovered that idmap backend on the PDC and the member server were both defaulted to tdb. This means they have independent views of UID to SID mappings I guess.