search for: junge

Hi all. Is there anything else to be done for the patch to be merged? Best regards Henrique Jung On 9 October 2017 at 19:56, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > Note, I guess it may work for "Unix Makefiles", since we discarded > autoconf support. > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:54 AM Henrique Jung via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:29:06PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:51:18AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:29:06PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:51:18AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>

Hi Chris Thanks for reviewing. I do not have commit access, this is my first contribution to LLVM. So I ask you to commit for me. Thanks On 9 October 2017 at 14:25, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > This patch looks reasonable to me. Thank you for submitting it. > > Is it correct to assume you don't have commit access? If you don't I can > commit it for you

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:51:18AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > So this is what I would call this option: >> > >> > VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM_IDENTITY_ADDRESS >> > >> > and the explanation should

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 02:51:18AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > So this is what I would call this option: >> > >> > VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM_IDENTITY_ADDRESS >> > >> > and the explanation should

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:01:56PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:42:00PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >>

I have two Windows 2003 Standard Edition Server with 2x 3,0 GHz P4 and 4 GB RAM. On each server rsync runs as cygwin daemon (rsync version 2.6.6; protocol version 29). The two servers are connected through a 2 MBit VPN link. When I sync a single large file or a whole directory, rsync only uses 50% of the available bandwidth. When I do the same between windows and linux server, rsync takes the

Hi Xen Developers, I had tested new XenARM for Arndale board that is updated in Anthony''s tree from 2 days ago. I expected that will be working. But, I can not boot Dom0 Kernel. I used kernel and XenARM both are from Xen Wiki(http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Arndale). It (seems) stopped after "(XEN) Freed 212kB init memory" message. When I

Running rsync 2.4.7pre1, using the --backup-dir option, I just realized today that file ownerships and permissions of backed up files are not preserved. In other words, if rsync moves an obsolete file to the backup dir, it's ownership seems to revert to root:root, and permissions change, as well. We are also using the -a (archive) option, by the way, which should mean "preserve

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:42:00PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:05:04PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >>

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:42:00PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:05:04PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >>

Dear Members of the R-Help, While using a R function - 'aggregate' that you developed, I become to have a question. In that function, > aggregate(x, by, FUN, ..., simplify = TRUE) I was wondering about what type of FUN I should write if I want to get "the most frequent value of the subgroup" as a summary statistics of the subgroups. I will appreciate if I can get

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:42:00PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> I rephrased it in terms of address translation. What do you think of >> this version? The flag name is slightly different too: >> >> >> VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM_NO_TRANSLATION This feature has the same >> meaning as

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:42:00PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> I rephrased it in terms of address translation. What do you think of >> this version? The flag name is slightly different too: >> >> >> VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM_NO_TRANSLATION This feature has the same >> meaning as

We are running Zope behind Squid 2.4Stable6 with squid in acceleration mode. The squid box (dual Pentium III 1 GHz, RH 7.2, Linux 2.4.9-21smp, 2GB Ram) has during busy hours a normal load of 0.2-0.3 . From time to time we see spikes over some hours where the load average of the machine is higher than 1.5 although there are no spikes in the CPU utilization. Also there is no increase in the number

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:08:12PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Hello, > > With Christoph's rework of the DMA API that recently landed, the patch > below is the only change needed in virtio to make it work in a POWER > secure guest under the ultravisor. > > The other change we need (making sure the device's dma_map_ops is NULL > so that the

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:08:12PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Hello, > > With Christoph's rework of the DMA API that recently landed, the patch > below is the only change needed in virtio to make it work in a POWER > secure guest under the ultravisor. > > The other change we need (making sure the device's dma_map_ops is NULL > so that the

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:58:40PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:13:59PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>

Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:58:40PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:13:59PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>