Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "junctures".
Did you mean:
juncture
1999 Apr 13
2
Making HTML Help files in Version 64.0
Hi,
I am having trouble making the HTML help files for the installed packages in
version 64.0
For example in 63.3 this is expected behavior:
> version
_
platform Windows
arch x86
os Win32
system x86, Win32
status Beta
status.rev 0
major 0
minor 63.3
year 1999
month March
day 6
language R
> make.packages.html()
>
However,
2004 Jul 10
6
How can Windows 2000 mount a share as a service?
I've asked every M$ expert I know, trolled through M$ TechNet, experimented
with SRVANY/INSTSRV login scripts which hard-code username/passwords to
login to a Samba 2.2.8a SMB server. I've experiment with and without the
"Allow service to interact with Desktop" switch turned on.
I am stuck. :( I can find no way to mount a share as a service, so that
IIS can serve web-pages
2006 Mar 09
1
[LLVMdev] ignoring inline assembly
I'm trying to use LLVM to do some semantic analysis of the Linux kernel
source code and am having issues with the inline assembly. At this juncture
I really don't care about what the inline assembly contains and I don't
intend to actually run the compiled version of the source, so if there is a
way I can tell LLVM to pretend the inline assembly isn't there that would be
fantastic.
2006 May 03
0
winbindd- confused about when to use
Hello:
I come to Samba with a strong Unix background but weak on the MS
networking side. Hence I've read a lot of the Samba documentation, more
than once... Something that continues to confuse me, however, is
whether or not I want/need winbindd for the task at hand.
Objective: replace aged NT4 domain/file server w/Samba based file
server.
Details:
1) approx. 25 users. stable staff
2018 Mar 16
2
[PATCH] Set KRB5PRINCIPAL in user environment
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 19:07 +1030, David Newall wrote:
> > There is no reply about this demand since the firt proposition
> > has if nobody in dev team cares about it :(
>
> I'm curious about the first section of the diff, which exports
> SSH_GSSAPI_DISPLAYNAME to PAM. Is that useful? Am I right that the
> PAM
> environment forms no part of the client session?
2006 Jul 18
2
FW: Large datasets in R
Hi,
I have two further comments/questions about large datasets in R.
1. Does R's ability to handle large datasets depend on the operating
system's use of virtual memory? In theory, at least, VM should make the
difference between installed RAM and virtual memory on a hard drive
primarily a determinant of how fast R will calculate rather than whether or
not it can do the calculations.
2005 May 04
1
Conditional validations
...dates_length_of :title, :within => 1..30, :if => :allowed_to_validate
end
This would solve the problem that Joe discovered (one-way encrypted
attributes can''t be validated like other attributes) and it would also
give the programmer enough versatility to make validations only at key
junctures and only for certain attributes. For example, I have a
4-part sign-up process that must record as much data as possible after
each step--it''s not good enough to keep it in the session and then
store it all in one save at the end.
The good news is that this modification to ActiveRecord::V...
2005 Mar 02
0
Re: AWS Client Usage
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:51:51 -0600, Chris Brinker
<chris.brinker-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I was talking on #rubyonrails some more and they seem to think that
> the model classes have to be copy and pasted/available to the
> ruby:client, in addition to the api. I find this advice a little odd
> considering .Net and apparently ColdfusionMX need no such
2006 Apr 06
1
GNUe tools on CentOS
Everyone,
Does anyone use the GNUe tool suite on CentOS?
Any gotcha's ? We are running CentOS 4.3.
Bob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060406/1e8b839e/attachment-0001.html>
2006 Aug 19
3
Cool 'n Quiet
Hey all,
Since moving a 4.3 x86-64 install from a single athlon64 to a new dual
core AMD cpu it would appear that cool'n quiet is having trouble as is
shown in the system logs;
powernow-k8: ignoring illegal change in lo freq table-2 to 0x2
powernow-k8: transition frequency failed
Any ideas ?
Cheers,
Brian.
2009 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] Modeling GPU vector registers, again (with my implementation)
Alex,
From my experience in working with GPU vector registers; there is no
support for swizzles in the manner that you would normally code them,
and in my case I have 6^4 permutations on src registers and 24
combinations in the dst registers. The way that I ended up handling this
was to have different register classes for 1, 2, 3 and 4 component
vectors. This made the generic cases very simple
2010 Feb 26
4
"Serious Error" with Mac OS X Leopard
I've successfully downloaded and run a number of simple Windows programs using Wine. But I've had no success with any programs that require an installer. The installation process seems to work properly, but then when I try to run the app, I get
Code:
The program <programname.exe> has encountered a serious problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
2009 Jul 15
3
[LLVMdev] please stabilize the trunk
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Dale Johannesen<dalej at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:43 PMPDT, Török Edwin wrote:
>> On 2009-07-15 23:24, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:52 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote:
>
>>> I wonder if we might be able to automate the stabilization somewhat.
>>> I'm not at all sure this can be
2009 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Modeling GPU vector registers, again (with my implementation)
Evan Cheng-2 wrote:
>
> Well, how many possible permutations are there? Is it possible to
> model each case as a separate physical register?
>
> Evan
>
I don't think so. There are 4x4x4x4 = 256 permutations. For example:
* xyzw: default
* zxyw
* yyyy: splat
Even if can model each of these 256 cases as a separate physical register,
how can I model the use of r0.xyzw in
2007 Dec 03
4
x86_64 versus i386
Hello,
On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we have the option of
installing either x86_64 or the i386 distribution. I would like to
know your experiences with the x86_64 port. How does it compare with
the i386 distribution in terms of stability, reliability and
performance ? How significant are the performance benefits gained by
using the x86_64 linux instead of i386 on the same
2005 Aug 15
1
DVD-RAM writer software for CentOS4
Firstly, let me thank all of the individuals who assisted me in
various matters regarding find, tar and ssh last week. Your
contributions were truly invaluable and I learned a great deal
thereby. The reason for that brief flurry of activity was an
administrative and technical move to store-to-disc from store-to-tape
for our server backups.
We presently use a mix of store to disc on
2011 Feb 08
12
multiple puppetmasters (w/ Passenger) behind load balancer
Hello Gang,
I''m working on scaling my puppet solution, and I''m deploying multiple
masters w/ passenger that are going sit behind a load balancer. If anyone
is using these type of setup, would you share how you deal with the SSL
certs? I''ve been following Bode''s Blog (http://bodepd.com/wordpress/?p=7),
and it''s not working to good for me.
2016 Dec 07
3
Setting up replication - First steps...
Just had my first (non-Dovecot) server failure due to dried out caps on the motherboard. Got me to thinking about my single-point-of-failure mail server. Currently running Dovecot and Postfix with no issues, but want to start taking steps just to be safe.
I currently run a filesystem backup every 24 hours to a tar file over NFS to another server in our rack. I am backing up:
/home/vmail
2006 Jul 27
0
Moving from Splus to R - advice/opinions request from amanagement perspective
Hi Dave. I'll try to offer some feedback from a fellow non-stats guy
working in a business setting. I've not directly transitioned from S+
to R, but I've previously hit roadblocks with SAS and SPSS that
compelled me to investigate the S/R languages.
I think that as you read messages on this list, you'll find that most
users don't implement R as a back end to a chain of
2007 Mar 23
7
[LLVMdev] June 2007 LLVM Developer's Meeting
All,
This message contains important information about the June 2007 LLVM
Developer's Meeting. If you plan to go (or even if you don't), please
read it carefully. Nothing is set in stone yet so if you have a
suggestion, please make it! Your feedback is wanted.
Thank you to all who participated in the Conference Poll we held at the
end of last year. It let us know your preferences and