search for: jumphosts

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 33 matches for "jumphosts".

Did you mean: jumphost
2013 Jul 05
2
Trouble with -W
I want to ssh from a client to a machine on a closed network via a jumphost; let's call them {client,internal,jumphost}.example.com. I have authpf set up on the jumphost so that when logged in, I am allowed to open TCP connections from the jumphost to port 22 on internal nodes. This works well with port forwarding: des at client ~% ssh -L2222:internal.example.com:22 jumphost.example.com
2017 Dec 27
4
What is the ssh_config equivalent to this syntax involving multiple at signs
My company uses a certain product which forces me to use a jumphost / ssh proxy. When connecting to a server I have to type "ssh myuser at technicaluser@targethost at jumphost" everytime. I tried to simplify this by editing my ssh_config and putting this into the file: Host targethost ProxyJump technicaluser at jumphost These lines are recognized but don't work like intended
2015 Oct 20
3
Is there any solution, or even work on, limiting which keys gets forwarded where?
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:31:46AM +0200, ?ngel Gonz?lez wrote: > On 16/10/15 12:46, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:15:03PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >>> if the intermediary machine (the "jumphost") is jumphost.example, and > >>> you are trying to reach bar.example.com (which is behind the firewall), >
2015 Oct 16
3
Is there any solution, or even work on, limiting which keys gets forwarded where?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:15:03PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > if the intermediary machine (the "jumphost") is jumphost.example, and > you are trying to reach bar.example.com (which is behind the firewall), > you would do: > ssh -oProxyCommand='ssh jumphost.example -W %h:%p' bar.example.com We use jump host, but there are literally hundreds of hosts behind
2015 Oct 15
4
Is there any solution, or even work on, limiting which keys gets forwarded where?
Hi, I'm in a situation where I'm using multiple SSH keys, each to connect to different set of servers. I can't load/unload keys on demand, as I usually am connected to at least 2 of such sets. But - some rogue "root", could get access to my agent-forwarding socket, and in turn, get access to keys loaded to agent (not in terms of obtaining the key, but being able to use it
2023 Aug 10
4
RT/Linux SCHED_RR/_FIXED to combat latency?
Good morning! We're experiencing rather very bad latency spikes on busy Linux systems, for example if one machine is the jumphost (ssh -J) for a few hundred connections, while at the same time handles CPU intensive tasks. Would RT/Linux SCHED_FIXED or SCHED_RR be of help in such a case, e.g. put all ssh processes into the SCHED_FIXED scheduling class, with a priority higher than the
2020 May 20
7
CanonicalHostname and ssh connections through a jumphost
raf wrote: > Warlich, Christof wrote: > > ... > > I want to be able to ssh to all internal hosts that live in the internal.sub.domain.net, > > i.e. that are only accessible through the internal.sub.domain.net jumphost without > > having to list each of these hosts somewhere, as they may frequently be added or > > removed from the internal domain and without being
2015 Oct 16
2
Is there any solution, or even work on, limiting which keys gets forwarded where?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:02:58PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:34 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski > <depesz at depesz.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm in a situation where I'm using multiple SSH keys, each to connect to > > different set of servers. > > > > I can't load/unload keys on demand, as I usually am
2017 Nov 03
2
ControlPath versus ProxyCommand
On 03Nov2017 13:07, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: >On Fri, 3 Nov 2017, Cameron Simpson wrote: >> TL;DR: I expect ProxyCommand to have effect in preference to >> ControlPath. [...] >> On reflection, of course these are distinct options and that side of >> things isn't, of itself, a bug. However, is there a sane use case for >> using
2020 Jan 21
2
Security implications of using ControlMaster
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:08:51AM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > So IMO disallowing session multiplexing is at most a speedbump that an > attacker will cross with relative ease. Speedbumps make sense sometimes, An attacker getting root on the jumphost gets immediate control of any _current_ persistent connections and new connections. Without ControlMaster it's a _lot_ harder to take
2020 Apr 17
2
Feature request: ProxyJump with Unix sockets
Dear developers, The ProxyJump feature is nowadays implemented on the basis of a TCP port forwarding on the jumping host, isn't it? As a result, this is affected by a AllowTcpForwarding=no configuration on the jumping host. So, may I suggest a variant based on Unix sockets (such as -L or -R does). Nice idea, isn't it? Any volunteer to implement this? Best regards Christophe
2023 Aug 10
1
RT/Linux SCHED_RR/_FIXED to combat latency?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023, Cedric Blancher wrote: >We're experiencing rather very bad latency spikes on busy Linux >systems, for example if one machine is the jumphost (ssh -J) for a few >hundred connections, while at the same time handles CPU intensive >tasks. > >Would RT/Linux SCHED_FIXED or SCHED_RR be of help in such a case, e.g. Did you already check the old and tried method
2017 Dec 29
5
Legacy option for key length?
All, I occasionally manage some APC PDU devices. I manage them via a VPN, which enforces super-heavy crypto, and their access is restricted to only jumphosts and the VPN. Basically, the only time you need to log into these is when you go to reboot something that's down. Their web UI with SSL doesn't work with modern browsers. Their CPU is...tiny, and their SSHd implementation is...old (and, I believe, proprietary). I think it defaults to RS...
2017 Nov 03
2
ControlPath versus ProxyCommand
TL;DR: I expect ProxyCommand to have effect in preference to ControlPath. I've just tripped over this one. I have an ssh Host (let us call it "MAIN") with a ControlPath and with ControlMaster=no, from the .ssh/config file. I also have a shell script whose purpose is to hop to a remote host through a port forward, which uses the ProxyCommand option like this: ProxyCommand ssh
2020 Nov 12
3
run firefox via an ssh tunnel
If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine and then locally run any browser, and access https://localhost:443 (assuming it's https. If it's plain http, use "http" and 80). Note that you'll be breaking some aspects of https
2020 Nov 12
3
run firefox via an ssh tunnel
On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:56:15PM +0000, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: >> If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote >> machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: >> ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine >> and
2015 Mar 26
0
[Bug 1585] Allow an `Include' option which reads another config file in place and does not error out when `Include' file not readable
...ients's systems, and they update/change their information/settings, and I need to update my config file trying to find where what is inserted. At least a directory with separate files for each client would've helped/solved that issue. Not to mention to keep my laptop, home desktop and work jumphosts all in sync, or with only the specifics needed for the specific host/device, there the include files directives would be great and helpfull -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
2020 Nov 12
0
run firefox via an ssh tunnel
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:56:15PM +0000, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: > > If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote > machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: > ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine > and then locally run any browser, and access >
2023 Apr 01
1
[Bug 3555] New: ForwardAgent doesn't work under Match canonical
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3555 Bug ID: 3555 Summary: ForwardAgent doesn't work under Match canonical Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.4p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2023 Aug 10
2
Packet Timing and Data Leaks
Philipp Marek wrote: > An easy workaround is to use a password manager (a plain file as a minimum) If you can/want to use a file then consider using a key instead. publickey authentication is non-interactive on the wire and the key is already unlocked so packet timing leaks nothing about your passphrase. //Peter