Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "jstanier".
Did you mean:
stanier
2009 Mar 27
3
[LLVMdev] Shared objects not being built on OS X
Hi again everyone...
After following the "Writing an LLVM Pass" tutorial using LLVM 2.5, there is
a part that states that:
"This makefile specifies that all of the .cpp files in the current directory
are to be compiled and linked together into a Debug/lib/Hello.so shared
object that can be dynamically loaded by the opt or bugpoint tools via their
-load options."
2009 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] Rolling my own LLVM assembly language parser
jstanier wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm currently in the first year of my PhD, and I'm going to be looking at an
> experimental IR for my thesis. After looking at a variety of research
> compilers I've come to the conclusion that LLVM is the nicest to work with
> for my purposes...
2009 Mar 25
4
[LLVMdev] Rolling my own LLVM assembly language parser
Hi everyone,
I'm currently in the first year of my PhD, and I'm going to be looking at an
experimental IR for my thesis. After looking at a variety of research
compilers I've come to the conclusion that LLVM is the nicest to work with
for my purposes. I was considering writing the code to construct this
experimental IR from LLVM assembly, and then at the end of the process (i.e.
new
2009 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] Rolling my own LLVM assembly language parser
...c frontend] -> bc
bc -> [your tool using llvm bitcode reader writer library, doing
whatever mutations to the IR you want and spitting out bc again] -> bc
bc -> [llvm backend (llc)/llvm-as/...] -> native code.
Doesn't that meet your requirements?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:09 PM, jstanier <j.stanier at sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Thank you both for your answers.
>
> The only reason I was interested in not using the built-in parsing library
> was that it would give me more flexibility over the language I program in,
> but if it means brushing up on my C++ then th...
2009 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] Shared objects not being built on OS X
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:18 PM, jstanier <j.stanier at sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi again everyone...
>
> After following the "Writing an LLVM Pass" tutorial using LLVM 2.5, there
> is
> a part that states that:
>
> "This makefile specifies that all of the .cpp files in the current
> directo...
2009 Mar 25
2
[LLVMdev] Rolling my own LLVM assembly language parser
Thank you both for your answers.
The only reason I was interested in not using the built-in parsing library
was that it would give me more flexibility over the language I program in,
but if it means brushing up on my C++ then this isn't too much of a problem
either.
With regards to using the in-memory LLVM, that's also a good approach.
However, I was thinking of structuring my thesis
2009 Mar 25
3
[LLVMdev] Rolling my own LLVM assembly language parser
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 17:12:34 John Criswell wrote:
> jstanier wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm currently in the first year of my PhD, and I'm going to be looking at
> > an experimental IR for my thesis. After looking at a variety of research
> > compilers I've come to the conclusion that LLVM is the nicest to work...