Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "json_object_foreach".
2017 Nov 23
1
Re: [PATCH 1/1] Switch from YAJL to Jansson
...from YAJL to Jansson:
> - configure checks, and buildsystem in general
> - packages pulled in the appliance
> - actual implementations
> - contrib scripts
> - documentation
>
> This also makes use of the better APIs available (e.g. json_object_get,
> json_array_foreach, and json_object_foreach). This does not change the
> API of our OCaml Yajl module.
>
> The only behaviour change is that Jansson by default accepts only
> objects and arrays as input (even though it has a flag to make it accept
> anything). Since this seems a good idea anyway, and as it is the RFC
> b...
2017 Nov 23
1
Re: [PATCH 1/1] Switch from YAJL to Jansson
...guestfs from YAJL to Jansson:
>- configure checks, and buildsystem in general
>- packages pulled in the appliance
>- actual implementations
>- contrib scripts
>- documentation
>
>This also makes use of the better APIs available (e.g. json_object_get,
>json_array_foreach, and json_object_foreach). This does not change the
>API of our OCaml Yajl module.
>
>The only behaviour change is that Jansson by default accepts only
>objects and arrays as input (even though it has a flag to make it accept
>anything). Since this seems a good idea anyway, and as it is the RFC
>behavio...
2017 Nov 23
4
[PATCH 0/1] RFC: switch from YAJL to Jansson
Hi,
recently, there was a discussion in the development list of libvirt on
switching to a different JSON library than YAJL [1]. Since we use YAJL,
and the points there IMHO apply to libguestfs as well, I decided to give
a try in switching to Jansson [2].
The result IMHO is nice, with the additional APIs of Jansson that
simplify some of our code. Unlike with YAJL, I did not set a minimum
2018 Feb 12
2
[PATCH v2 0/1] RFC: switch from YAJL to Jansson
Hi,
recently, there was a discussion in the development list of libvirt on
switching to a different JSON library than YAJL [1]. Since we use YAJL,
and the points there IMHO apply to libguestfs as well, I decided to give
a try in switching to Jansson [2].
The result IMHO is nice, with the additional APIs of Jansson that
simplify some of our code. Unlike with YAJL, I did not set a minimum
2018 Feb 12
0
[PATCH v2 1/1] Switch from YAJL to Jansson
...r API.
Hence, switch all of libguestfs from YAJL to Jansson:
- configure checks, and buildsystem in general
- packages pulled in the appliance
- actual implementations
- contrib scripts
- documentation
This also makes use of the better APIs available (e.g. json_object_get,
json_array_foreach, and json_object_foreach). This does not change the
API of our OCaml Yajl module.
---
appliance/packagelist.in | 13 ++--
builder/Makefile.am | 4 +-
builder/yajl-c.c | 66 ++++++++++-----------
contrib/p2v/aux-scripts/do-build.sh | 8 +--
contrib/p2v/build-p2v-iso.sh...
2017 Nov 23
0
[PATCH 1/1] Switch from YAJL to Jansson
...r API.
Hence, switch all of libguestfs from YAJL to Jansson:
- configure checks, and buildsystem in general
- packages pulled in the appliance
- actual implementations
- contrib scripts
- documentation
This also makes use of the better APIs available (e.g. json_object_get,
json_array_foreach, and json_object_foreach). This does not change the
API of our OCaml Yajl module.
The only behaviour change is that Jansson by default accepts only
objects and arrays as input (even though it has a flag to make it accept
anything). Since this seems a good idea anyway, and as it is the RFC
behaviour, then change one of t...
2018 Aug 20
0
[PATCH 4/4] mltools: JSON: unify JSON_parser type with JSON.json_t.
...the OCaml list backwards, but JSON
+ * dictionaries are supposed to be unordered so that shouldn't
+ * matter, right? Well except that for some consumers this does
+ * matter (eg. simplestreams which incorrectly uses a dict when it
+ * really should use an array).
+ */
json_object_foreach (val, key, jvalue) {
- v = caml_alloc_tuple (2);
+ tv = caml_alloc_tuple (2);
sv = caml_copy_string (key);
- Store_field (v, 0, sv);
+ Store_field (tv, 0, sv);
sv = convert_json_t (jvalue, level + 1);
- Store_field (v, 1, sv);
- Store_field (lv, i, v);
-...
2018 Aug 22
3
[PATCH v2 0/2] mltools: JSON: unify JSON & JSON parser.
v2:
- Added back the null value.
- Reran the tests.
Rich.
2018 Aug 20
6
[PATCH 0/4] mltools: JSON unification
An evolution of:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-August/msg00155.html