search for: jsg

...s interested. ========================= clang 20070717 svn --enable-optimizations clang version 1.0 (http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk 76176M) text data bss dec hex 7412287 160516 1049460 8622263 8390b7 19m4.11s real 16m56.35s user 1m44.23s system -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 122K Jul 18 01:41 if_spppsubr.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 127K Jul 18 01:36 aic79xx.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 130K Jul 18 01:46 pci_subr.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 161K Jul 18 01:38 bwi.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 349K Jul 18 01:47 isp_pci.o -rwxr-xr-x 1 jsg wsrc 7.9M Jul 18 01:54 bs...

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: > > This seems to go against notes such as > > http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance > > which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. > > I think the URL you want is actually > http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html. The differenc...

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: >> > This seems to go against notes such as >> > http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance >&g...

...directories and doesn't appear in the gcc directory listings at all (I assume the listings were fed through tail or something, but there's clearly a sizeable difference there) On Jul 17, 2009, at 5:41 PMPDT, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: >>>> This seems to go against notes such as >>>> http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#perf...

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: > This seems to go against notes such as > http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance > which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. I think the URL you want is actually http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html. The difference isn't as dramatic when y...

...55.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:22815 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1 TX packets:16404 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:2154 Interrupt:12 Base address:0x6c00 Please help! -- // Jean-Serge Gagnon jsg@newlix.com // Newlix Corporation http://www.newlix.com

...ug.cgi?id=76376 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76376 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: mesa does not build after nouveau loader changes Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: OpenBSD Reporter: jsg at openbsd.org Hardware: Other Status: NEW Version: git Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Product: Mesa After commit 51989817e6767d8ef469708c69d7ce38b87e9b6e mesa does not build here when configured with --with-gallium-drivers=r300,r600,swrast \ -...

Railsoids: FormTestHelper rules. It tests your response.body form at the same time as it triggers your action, with all the parameters in that form. This obviously improves quality. But it took issue with this: submit_form ''validate_stuff'' do |form| form[''IBhidden''] = ''validate'' end The field IBhidden is a hidden field. To be

On Jul 17, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: >> This seems to go against notes such as >> http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance >> which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. > > I think the URL you want is actually > http://clang.llvm.org/performance.html. The difference is...

...e. Can someone point me to any documentation that deals with configuring this board for R2? If there isn't any, can anyone tell me where I should look to start hacking the code? Failure is not an option here, so any advice is appreciated. Thanks for your assistance, Chris Ziomkowski cziom@jsg.co.th

...h 'wins support = yes' and 'netbios name = HOST250'. If I type 'smbclient -L host250 -R bcast', I get: Added interface ip=192.168.2.250 bcast=192.168.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 cli_open_sockets: Unknown host HOST250. Anybody have any ideas? -- // Jean-Serge Gagnon jsg@newlix.com // Newlix Corporation http://www.newlix.com

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2491 Bug ID: 2491 Summary: x11-ssh-askpass (ssh-add) sets incorrect flags in WM_SIZE_HINTS Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: ssh-add

I just cranked up Samba 2.0.6 on NetBSD-sun3 1.4. The clients are Windows 98 (non-SE). I have had experience with earlier versions of Samba, so I was able to get 2.0.6 up and running without great difficulty. I exported a directory and was able to mount it on my Win98 machines fine. Using Explorer, everything looked like I expected it to: files were listed with their full names and I was able

Hi, This is mostly a note for downstream distributors of OpenSSH. I've just pushed fixes to the V_9_9 stable branch for a bug in the mlkem768x25519-sha256 key exchange algorithm that was added in this release that causes connection failures when connecting between big-endian and little-endian hosts. The problem is on the big-endian side. No change is required for the more common

Dear all: I am trying to compile syslinux on my machine. It's a Linux From Scratch build, pure 64 x86_64 with uClibc, using kernel 2.6.26.5, gcc 4.3.2 and binutils 2.18.0. The compile fails at the following command: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/lfs/src/pkgs/syslinux/syslinux-3.72/gpxe' make -C src EMBEDDED_IMAGE=../../core/pxelinux.0 bin/undionly.kpxe make[2]: Entering directory

This looks like the same case as the thread: Problem ATA-711-723-Oh323-Asterisk that was posted back in August. Although, given the nature of trampled memory problems it could be almost anything. The Oh323 library dies in a call to realloc. This is almost certainly indicative of someone stomping on memory somewhere previously, or else a memory bug in the pwlib library itself. (Which I find

Everyone, I need a rock solid reliable way of sending calls from Asterisk to Skype. No need for the other direction. Would chanskype or siskyee be better for this? Does anyone have any experience? The trial versions are so crippled they are useless for testing. Chanskype only lets you test a 15 second call, and siskyee keeps interrupting the conversation so you can't hear the quality.