search for: jseymour

Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Seymour <jseymour@LinxNet.com> Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! jseymour@LinxNet.com (Jim Seymour) wrote: > > John Capo <jc@irbs.com> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > Scuttlebut on NANAE is that Joe w...

...All, So I tried to upgrade to 2.5.2p2 today. Got this when I stopped/started sshd: Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key Re-installed 2.3.0p1 and all was well again. This look familiar to anybody? Thanks, Jim -- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymour at jimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html http://jimsun.LinxNet.com |

To Whom It May Concern, I tried emailing the ostensible mailing list owner, at both addresses noted, and got no response. Maybe somebody here knows how to alert whomever must know about this. Observe... From home (business class cable with static IP and valid rDNS)... $ host -t mx samba.org samba.org mail is handled by 10 smtp.samba.org. samba.org mail is handled by 5

On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jim Seymour <jseymour at LinxNet.com> wrote: > But the manual > also says "The Axxium Pro system communicates with your computer using > an advanced binary protocol." I can see that phrase being used to describe BCM/XCP.

Hello, I just built openssh-2.5.2p2 on an HP running HP-UX 11.00. Seems now when I try and connect to other HP's running ssh with version openssh-2.3.0p1 (using protocol version 2), I'm getting disconnected because of a "Bad packet length" error: ssh -v isd1 ... debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: send

...f redundant (DHCP, DNS especially, never hurts to have multiple more NTP's). I too like to stack up as much as I can on these modern boxes, but I ensure there's some redundancy to cope with the unexpected. I hope the perspective helps -- lee On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jim Seymour <jseymour at linxnet.com> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100 > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 > > > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com&...

NOTE: Please honour the "Reply-To" and do not "Reply-All". I'm reading the mailing list. I wouldn't be posting to it if I was not and I don't need two copies. Thanks! On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:32:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > [snip] > > Oops. I missed that you had missed this! When you said flat zone > file, I took

Hi There, We have this rather large-ish floor-standing Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650. I tried using both the "bestups" and "blazer_ser" drivers with it, but no go. So before I go any further: *Should* one of these work with it and, if not, do I have any options? (E.g.: Modify a current driver, resuscitate one that was started and abandoned, etc.? I can code.) My test

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 > > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [snip] > >> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and > >> usually > > So if

Sent this before, but it apparently got lost in the ether... On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:32:23 -0400 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > You mentioned the null-modem cable, but are you using a motherboard > RS-232 port, or a USB-to-serial converter? Real, honest-to-goodness RS-232 port. [snip] > Maybe Kjell has some insight on what else to try with the bcmxcp

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:32:23 -0400 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > You mentioned the null-modem cable, but are you using a motherboard > RS-232 port, or a USB-to-serial converter? Real, honest-to-goodness RS-232 port. [snip] > Maybe Kjell has some insight on what else to try with the bcmxcp > driver. > If I could just see what, if anything, the

Hi There, Relative to my previous question ("Samba As PDC: Wrong Workgroup?"), when I list my users I get: $ pdbedit -v -u Administrator Unix username: Administrator NT username: Account Flags: [U ] ... Domain: ... If I try to alter the Administrator account to be in Domain MYDOMAIN, as in: $ pdbedit -r -I MYDOMAIN -u

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:05:35 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > Hi, it might help if you can explain why you want the Administrator > to be in your Domain. Uhm... It seemed like The Right Thing To Do? :) > > Also what docs are you reading ? What haven't I read? Everything I could find. Some of it perhaps not the right thing,

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided > one... [remainder snipped] Yikes! I thought it awfully suspicious that Samba required so few additional packages and so little "glue work" to get an AD PDC going. Now I know why. We *require*, not desire, but

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:51:30 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > ... what you seem > to be missing is that you run bind9 instead of the internal samba4 > DNS server. Whatever DNS server you do use, it needs to only know > about the samba4 dns domain (which also needs to be the realm name), > anything else it gets from its forwarder. I did not miss

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:27:03 -0400 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > I've never experienced a problem sending to the list. Also any > properly working mail server should have worked as well. If one MX > server doesn't answer it should try the next one... as long as one is > up the mail should go through. Yeah, I know how it's supposed to work, I

Hi All, Through interpreting what the current Wiki article says, plus some trial and error: The following AppArmor rules *appear* to work for a Samba AD DC using the stuff from the distro for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: $ cat /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named # Site-specific additions and overrides for usr.sbin.named. # For more details, please see /etc/apparmor.d/local/README. /dev/urandom w,

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:40:59 -0500 Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: [snip] > > Sorry Rowland, but the break happened before the badlock patches when > Debian jumped from 4.1.x to 4.3.x, skipping 4.2.x altogether. [snip] > > Jim, currently at Debian 4.4.5. If you search this list, you will > find others who have had the same thing happen. To my

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:15:43 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: [snip] > > Yes it does sound strange, but, on windows, groups can and do own > directories & files. An xidNumber is just that, a number, it is the > context in how that number is used that is important. If you give > Domain Admins a gidNumber attribute, then Domain Admins becomes just > a

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:55:55 +0200 Léon van der Kaap <leonkaap at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for good installation instructions for an active > directory domain controller installation of samba4. The only source I > have reliably found is > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller > which is unfortunately both