search for: jrinst

...efactoring of the current insn tables will be necessary. I intend to create classes for each insn with the opcode and have the current insn definitions use the current names but based on a insn class. For example, a conditional indirect branch insn is currently defined as: def JMPR_cdnNotPt_V3: JRInst<(outs), (ins PredRegs:$src1, IntRegs:$src2), "if (!$src1.new) jumpr:t $src2", []>, Requires<[HasV3T]>; Its new definition would be like this: let Defs = [PC], isP...

...10 +41,11 @@ let isCall = 1, neverHasSideEffects = 1, >> } >> >> >> +// Jump to address from register >> // if(p?.new) jumpr:t r? >> let isReturn = 1, isTerminator = 1, isBarrier = 1, >> Defs = [PC], Uses = [R31] in { >> - def JMPR_cPnewt: JRInst<(outs), (ins PredRegs:$src1, IntRegs:$src2), >> + def JMPR_cdnPt_V3: JRInst<(outs), (ins PredRegs:$src1, IntRegs:$src2), >> "if ($src1.new) jumpr:t $src2", >> []>, Requires<[HasV3T]>; >> } >>...