search for: jpr

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "jpr".

Did you mean: apr
2003 Oct 14
1
[Bug 743] configure stanza for sco3.2v5
...co3.2v5 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jpr at jpr.com Not really a bug, but the section in 'configure' for sco3.2v5 is not quite right. no_dev_ptmx=1 is wrong, this OS does have /dev/ptmx. -lx and -ltinfo are NOT needed, IFF the release is at least 3.2v5.0.7 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the ass...
2005 Jun 20
1
[Bug 1057] Why is '# Compression yes' in the default sshd_config file?
...file? Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jpr at jpr.com The man page for ssh discusses Compression, and says it can be set in the configuration file. Yet for some reason, the supplied default sshd_config file is where # Compression yes is displayed, as if it were a parameter to be set for sshd instead of ssh. ------- You are rece...
1997 May 15
1
Vulnerability in Elm-ME+
Hello, I have confirmed that the recently-reported vulnerability in Elm is also present in Elm-ME+ and thus also in Debian GNU/Linux version 1.2, prerelease version 1.3, and development tree "unstable". Below is a short diff to correct the problem. Debian GNU/Linux 1.2.x uses stock Elm 2.4pl25. Users of that version of Elm should upgrade to Elm-ME+ as detailed below. Debian 1.3
2005 Jul 11
2
Unable to dial certain calls
To begin with, I am new to both asterisk and VOIP and although I've gotten pretty far with my Asterisk setup and have two different sip accounts working fine for outgoing calls I am having trouble with one issue. My problem is that I have another provider who uses IAX2 that I wish to use for calling various countries, including local (The Netherlands) calls and calls to the US to
2005 Apr 13
2
error executing the smbclient
Dear Samba Team, I have this error executing the smbclient program on a SCO Unix Open Server 5.0.2 : dynamic linker : smbclient : error opening /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.4 Killed I checked it, but I don't have any library with that name. What can I do? Thanks & regards, Fabian Bustamante CARTOPEL GROUP Cuenca - Ecuador.
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...erstood :) So, in this case, the problem is that your version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a old version of the jdk. See you, Gaël 2013/11/21 Adam Pridgen <Adam.pridgen at rice.edu>: > I guess I mispoke, I checked out the source fr...
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
I guess I mispoke, I checked out the source from http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk. I thought this was vmkit2. I guess I was just referring to vmkit then. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Gaël Thomas <gael.thomas00 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Adam, > > I don't know which repo you have used? Because only the llvm repo is > maintained (not the gforge one), and
2014 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit is retired (but you can help if you want!)
Oups, sorry for the mistake, llcj (not llc:)) is not more maintained! Gaël Le 10 sept. 2014 00:27, "Gaël Thomas" <gael.thomas00 at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi Brian, > > So, I confirm, llc is not more maintained. And using vmjc is probably > the good starting point to translate Java bytecode into llvm bitcode. > > However, I think that your hack (changing the way
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...in this case, the problem is that your > version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support > the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here: > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR > > Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not > working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a > old version of the jdk. > > See you, > Gaël > > > > 2013/11/21 Adam Pridgen <Adam.pridgen at rice.edu>: &...
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...m is that your >>> version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support >>> the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here: >>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR >>> >>> Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not >>> working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a >>> old version of the jdk. >>> >>> See you, >>> Gaël >>> >>&g...
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
..., the problem is that your >> version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support >> the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here: >> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR >> >> Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not >> working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a >> old version of the jdk. >> >> See you, >> Gaël >> >> >> >> 2013/11/21 Adam...
2013 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...ur >>>> version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support >>>> the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here: >>>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR >>>> >>>> Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not >>>> working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a >>>> old version of the jdk. >>>> >>>> See you, >>>>...
2009 Aug 01
23
Hi doubt in unit testing
def test_check_for_validity post=County.new(:name=>"myname",:description=>"mydesc") assert post.save end above is the method and when i run unit test it is saying as 1) Failure: test_check_for_validity(CountyTest) [/test/unit/county_test.rb:10]: <false> is not true. what does it say i cannot under stand please help -- Karthik.k Mobile -
2009 May 21
1
[PATCH server] Updated look and feel for empty grid views
...1X5=0%q&)rz#_ku3mHM9@|)lh*0 at cq_*@64urS zG1<AppHXd(DS$R~R7IzoVV$R{DmJ=9L{R+E=RS|e(|C6mo9-0_P{c08Y&HW4 at A;7* z;oRAsS2Ql(1>(GM2xqx|Yk^XVUwGexq%u$@icdX##6SGKeHIw{odkg+c!iS=Ayy3V zfDjTyYc*2f2_T|X#Td5&Y1L&A1RoGmAY at A<ma>hdf`Dr;jzYGHO$ZJz6(TsK)O2+d z8}cslS9`q<`-eyT-tT=JPr$zlO`DY~l|rL~BFMlGzWbe|X&S%BE4Wm2w<XRd1l#b{ zYsb9pEf4XQOG9i}@<*4){OU&z at H(NN$0-NIS>OtfXo2x=_bq^@<3kWJnyq4oL=aSb zr%=&yeVg%!5Y}#UW!bHNMYLUB?*mF&65-g&B)ufTikz}qVvM0`8m7y#{kLBQ5Q9f3 ziM2~6qdDi#@1Uh#gD3C7qkRP?`<BIg%Dk-D8_oH5e*9f%<N5t>l>FK!4?%14Jm7?i z_1x;&gt...
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...XCY)+nFUuhEN;6E2>04nW63RCHxI{%ykvx5^n$qo&mG~;9XJHM{>^_r+ zlW>#7vygQnj&ARb=4RWHNVrXk9f0gl_~KK9X;cxB9$}NXlXvV+$RRXb*j0x-7NS5_ z0GUZ%7PoGdm_ICTv+ at K>V<&cDTZ-lR7enS&!VNyL&}HqJqG;j~Ju`8jLKoX59g%Id z?R-s_i<whH38dJQ2kR^yTPL{*FA8F- at 0$O)xug<Vjg%<(t?LoNke1ldaErJPRIpWj zf;H0F9Ucq~Ev&6=@tYq%4AU3r?XAtMsH?6`8nW1LO}^Z4U2SbJ6iKQ)?DoW62{_Pm z`K`zy?DGJ`GHgm0o6^L3CQ^qb)g5k5|0*v|5SPZiC+X5ChodY|0>8g5>?jMF5xrdO z1kQl3GGekgt<Uk^h}ZB$EOw{xsLgy3?V|FX3iHUoh}dmpnG4cPn3cg#hl`Ewl>1yE zaWpkEQB)jOSlFuA?h|5GyUZiI=dhb}mj&U;R9l0wd*`q#=jLOQislJ|NP1Y~#=651 z-YlBkm...
2019 Apr 30
1
patch to improve matrix conformability error message
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:28:46PM -0700, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest? > Slippery slope? What's the next step? Can it get committed? > Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how > Joshua's second message had timestamp earlier than his first message? As a new subscriber, I guess my
2019 Apr 05
2
patch to improve matrix conformability error message
With this patch, > A <- matrix(1, 2, 2) > B <- matrix(2, 3, 2) > A %*% B Error in A %*% B : non-conformable arguments of dimension (2, 2) and (3, 2) >From 205b591d4d14b5ff667325fb233a6deb08314726 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Nathaniel Pritikin <jpritikin at pobox.com> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:03:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Improve non-conformable arguments error message --- src/main/array.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/main/array.c b/src/main/array.c index 4b95e33..cedf627 100644 --- a/sr...