Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "jpr".
Did you mean:
apr
2003 Oct 14
1
[Bug 743] configure stanza for sco3.2v5
...co3.2v5
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: Build system
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: jpr at jpr.com
Not really a bug, but the section in 'configure' for sco3.2v5 is not quite right.
no_dev_ptmx=1 is wrong, this OS does have /dev/ptmx.
-lx and -ltinfo are NOT needed, IFF the release is at least 3.2v5.0.7
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the ass...
2005 Jun 20
1
[Bug 1057] Why is '# Compression yes' in the default sshd_config file?
...file?
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.1p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Documentation
AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: jpr at jpr.com
The man page for ssh discusses Compression, and says it can be set in the
configuration file.
Yet for some reason, the supplied default sshd_config file is where
# Compression yes
is displayed, as if it were a parameter to be set for sshd instead of ssh.
------- You are rece...
1997 May 15
1
Vulnerability in Elm-ME+
Hello,
I have confirmed that the recently-reported vulnerability in Elm is also
present in Elm-ME+ and thus also in Debian GNU/Linux version 1.2, prerelease
version 1.3, and development tree "unstable".
Below is a short diff to correct the problem.
Debian GNU/Linux 1.2.x uses stock Elm 2.4pl25. Users of that version of Elm
should upgrade to Elm-ME+ as detailed below.
Debian 1.3
2005 Jul 11
2
Unable to dial certain calls
To begin with, I am new to both asterisk and VOIP and although I've
gotten pretty far with my Asterisk setup and have two different sip
accounts working fine for outgoing calls I am having trouble with one
issue.
My problem is that I have another provider who uses IAX2 that I wish
to use for calling various countries, including local (The
Netherlands) calls and calls to the US to
2005 Apr 13
2
error executing the smbclient
Dear Samba Team,
I have this error executing the smbclient program on a SCO Unix Open Server 5.0.2 :
dynamic linker : smbclient : error opening /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.4
Killed
I checked it, but I don't have any library with that name.
What can I do?
Thanks & regards,
Fabian Bustamante
CARTOPEL GROUP
Cuenca - Ecuador.
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...erstood :) So, in this case, the problem is that your
version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support
the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR
Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not
working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a
old version of the jdk.
See you,
Gaël
2013/11/21 Adam Pridgen <Adam.pridgen at rice.edu>:
> I guess I mispoke, I checked out the source fr...
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
I guess I mispoke, I checked out the source from
http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk. I thought this was
vmkit2. I guess I was just referring to vmkit then.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Gaël Thomas <gael.thomas00 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I don't know which repo you have used? Because only the llvm repo is
> maintained (not the gforge one), and
2014 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit is retired (but you can help if you want!)
Oups, sorry for the mistake, llcj (not llc:)) is not more maintained!
Gaël
Le 10 sept. 2014 00:27, "Gaël Thomas" <gael.thomas00 at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi Brian,
>
> So, I confirm, llc is not more maintained. And using vmjc is probably
> the good starting point to translate Java bytecode into llvm bitcode.
>
> However, I think that your hack (changing the way
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...in this case, the problem is that your
> version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support
> the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR
>
> Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not
> working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a
> old version of the jdk.
>
> See you,
> Gaël
>
>
>
> 2013/11/21 Adam Pridgen <Adam.pridgen at rice.edu>:
&...
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...m is that your
>>> version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support
>>> the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here:
>>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR
>>>
>>> Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not
>>> working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a
>>> old version of the jdk.
>>>
>>> See you,
>>> Gaël
>>>
>>&g...
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
..., the problem is that your
>> version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support
>> the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here:
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR
>>
>> Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not
>> working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a
>> old version of the jdk.
>>
>> See you,
>> Gaël
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/21 Adam...
2013 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] vmkit2 core dump after building mmtk
...ur
>>>> version of openjdk is probably not supported. In fact, we only support
>>>> the version 7u23 of openjdk :) You can find this version here:
>>>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase7-521261.html#jdk-7u25-oth-JPR
>>>>
>>>> Currently, I'm modifying the internal design of vmkit and I'm not
>>>> working on the trunk, that's why the version of the trunk requires a
>>>> old version of the jdk.
>>>>
>>>> See you,
>>>>...
2009 Aug 01
23
Hi doubt in unit testing
def test_check_for_validity
post=County.new(:name=>"myname",:description=>"mydesc")
assert post.save
end
above is the method and when i run unit test it is saying as
1) Failure:
test_check_for_validity(CountyTest) [/test/unit/county_test.rb:10]:
<false> is not true.
what does it say i cannot under stand
please help
--
Karthik.k
Mobile -
2009 May 21
1
[PATCH server] Updated look and feel for empty grid views
...1X5=0%q&)rz#_ku3mHM9@|)lh*0 at cq_*@64urS
zG1<AppHXd(DS$R~R7IzoVV$R{DmJ=9L{R+E=RS|e(|C6mo9-0_P{c08Y&HW4 at A;7*
z;oRAsS2Ql(1>(GM2xqx|Yk^XVUwGexq%u$@icdX##6SGKeHIw{odkg+c!iS=Ayy3V
zfDjTyYc*2f2_T|X#Td5&Y1L&A1RoGmAY at A<ma>hdf`Dr;jzYGHO$ZJz6(TsK)O2+d
z8}cslS9`q<`-eyT-tT=JPr$zlO`DY~l|rL~BFMlGzWbe|X&S%BE4Wm2w<XRd1l#b{
zYsb9pEf4XQOG9i}@<*4){OU&z at H(NN$0-NIS>OtfXo2x=_bq^@<3kWJnyq4oL=aSb
zr%=&yeVg%!5Y}#UW!bHNMYLUB?*mF&65-g&B)ufTikz}qVvM0`8m7y#{kLBQ5Q9f3
ziM2~6qdDi#@1Uh#gD3C7qkRP?`<BIg%Dk-D8_oH5e*9f%<N5t>l>FK!4?%14Jm7?i
z_1x;>...
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...XCY)+nFUuhEN;6E2>04nW63RCHxI{%ykvx5^n$qo&mG~;9XJHM{>^_r+
zlW>#7vygQnj&ARb=4RWHNVrXk9f0gl_~KK9X;cxB9$}NXlXvV+$RRXb*j0x-7NS5_
z0GUZ%7PoGdm_ICTv+ at K>V<&cDTZ-lR7enS&!VNyL&}HqJqG;j~Ju`8jLKoX59g%Id
z?R-s_i<whH38dJQ2kR^yTPL{*FA8F- at 0$O)xug<Vjg%<(t?LoNke1ldaErJPRIpWj
zf;H0F9Ucq~Ev&6=@tYq%4AU3r?XAtMsH?6`8nW1LO}^Z4U2SbJ6iKQ)?DoW62{_Pm
z`K`zy?DGJ`GHgm0o6^L3CQ^qb)g5k5|0*v|5SPZiC+X5ChodY|0>8g5>?jMF5xrdO
z1kQl3GGekgt<Uk^h}ZB$EOw{xsLgy3?V|FX3iHUoh}dmpnG4cPn3cg#hl`Ewl>1yE
zaWpkEQB)jOSlFuA?h|5GyUZiI=dhb}mj&U;R9l0wd*`q#=jLOQislJ|NP1Y~#=651
z-YlBkm...
2019 Apr 30
1
patch to improve matrix conformability error message
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:28:46PM -0700, frederik at ofb.net wrote:
> I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest?
> Slippery slope?
What's the next step? Can it get committed?
> Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how
> Joshua's second message had timestamp earlier than his first message?
As a new subscriber, I guess my
2019 Apr 05
2
patch to improve matrix conformability error message
With this patch,
> A <- matrix(1, 2, 2)
> B <- matrix(2, 3, 2)
> A %*% B
Error in A %*% B :
non-conformable arguments of dimension (2, 2) and (3, 2)
>From 205b591d4d14b5ff667325fb233a6deb08314726 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Nathaniel Pritikin <jpritikin at pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:03:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Improve non-conformable arguments error message
---
src/main/array.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/array.c b/src/main/array.c
index 4b95e33..cedf627 100644
--- a/sr...