search for: jovi

...e usecase could be: Linux kernel compiled by gcc want to load kernel module compiled by Clang (I know there have some problem to compile kernel by Clang currently, but ignore those problem in here) I just concern about the call conversion problem, and compatibility between gcc and clang. Thanks .jovi

Hi... i would like know how to one playlist handler whith perl? where a search one "HOW TO" thanks.. -- ALPHANET INFORM?TICA LTDA www.alphanetbh.com.br Belo Horizonte MG Leandro Campos (31)30726251 (31)87883925 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20071226/c577c111/attachment.htm

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:11:30PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to link native codes generated by different compiler? > > the usecase could be: > Linux kernel compiled by gcc want to load kernel module compiled by Clang > (I know there have some problem to compile kernel by Clang currently, > but i...

...this idea sounds? I really think llvm design is nature to suit this idea, benefit from llvm's IR. If we really implement this idea, it would be very valuable for whole Linux community, trust me:) I would appreciate if you can give me some technical comments on this design. Thanks very much. .jovi

On 4/30/13 1:10 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >> On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >>> developer,...

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >> developer, >> Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. >> >> In Linux world, traditionally compile Linux kern...

On 4/29/2013 7:32 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: > The case I really want to solve is some kernel change cause ko must > need to recompile, like data structure field offset changed in new > kernel, this will make offset mismatch between new kernel and old ko. > This is the reason why I want to delay type structure eval...

Hi Jovi, > Is it possible to link native codes generated by different compiler? It should be. Clang aims to be GCC-compatible (and certainly in ABI issues on a given platform like Linux). Any issues would be considered bugs and we'd like to know about them. Cheers. Tim.

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? > Thanks Dupas. I checked DKMS you mentioned, basically DKMS is just a ko and its sources management tool. It's not easy to deploy ko source into target machine, and it's more

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/29/2013 7:32 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> The case I really want to solve is some kernel change cause ko must need >> to recompile, like data structure field offset changed in new kernel, this >> will make offset mismatch between new kernel and old ko. This is the reason >> why I want to del...

On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel developer, > Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. > > In Linux world, traditionally compile Linux kernel module only have one way: > compile...

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:14:57PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas > <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? > > > Thanks Dupas. > > I checked DKMS you menti...

...LLVM IR .o file" The problem is you wish to link in the linux kernel headers at "install" time. The problem I see is that the linux kernel headers are C source files, so how is that going to work? You need a C compiler to understand the Linux kernel headers. On 28 April 2013 17:42, Jovi Zhang <bookjovi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel developer, > Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. > > In Linux world, traditionally compile Linux kernel module on...

Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? Le 28 avr. 2013 à 18:42, Jovi Zhang <bookjovi at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel developer, > Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. > > In Linux world, traditionally compile Linux kernel mod...

On 4/29/2013 9:13 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: > We arrived the key part: offsetof and sizeof are resolved to a > constant by Clang before they are lowered to LLVM IR, so that's the > main reason why there have a high-level IR file except LLVM IR file, > that high-level IR file contain unresolved structure field...

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton at gmail.com> wrote: > Jovi, > > The problem with kernel module binary compatibility is that if you > fixed the kernel module binary API, it will stifle innovation within > the kernel. > So, to the kernel developers, a changing module API is a bonus feature > and not an issue. I expect you will have no suppo...

...dows XP)... http://moffett.isis.ucla.edu/gwplot/ Examples were by far the most useful learning tool during my programming endeavors so I hope this may help in your own projects. Thanks, Jason _________________________________________________________________ Enter for your chance to IM with Bon Jovi, Seal, Bow Wow, or Mary J Blige using MSN Messenger http://entertainment.msn.com/imastar

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:40 PM, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton at gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure this would work. It might be able to handle changes in > structure, but what about changes in the accessor functions? function change is not a big deal, take a example, one function referenced in ko, but not exist in new kernel, how could we replace new kernel in this case? This

I am not sure this would work. It might be able to handle changes in structure, but what about changes in the accessor functions? I also don't see how this would be easier than compiling from source on the target machine. You still need all the kernel headers on the target machine because llvm with your patch would need them so that it uses the correct structure. The best approach for kernel

A month or two ago I sent an email to this list proposing to expand the list of "standard" tags for Ogg Vorbis. No tag would be required, but if you wanted to encode certain types of information about a file, you could use a standard tag. I went through the whole discussion, and revised my proposal in light of all the comments from everyone. Here is the updated proposal. This