search for: journal_dirty_metadata

...var/run/random-seed': File exists chmod: getting attributes of `/var/run/random-seed': No such file or directory Then, it goes a little farther, and I get an Assertion. I turned on the buffer header debugging, and here's the output: buffer trace for buffer at 0xc02db000 (I am CPU 0) journal_dirty_metadata() [transaction.c:1101] file as BJ_Metadata b_state:0xb1 b_list:BUF_CLEAN b_jlist:BJ_Metadata on_lru:1 cpu:0 on_hash:1 b_count:2 b_blocknr:1 b_jbd:1 b_frozen_data:00000000 b_committed_data:00000000 b_transaction:1 b_next_transaction:0 b_cp_transaction:0 b_trans_is_running:1...

...ist initially, they seem to think it might be a memory > disk problem or perhaps a bug? And said you guys might know more about it. Dec 18 03:18:09 data3 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000020 RIP: Dec 18 03:18:09 data3 kernel: <ffffffffa003cfc8>{:jbd:journal_dirty_metadata+71} Dec 18 03:18:09 data3 kernel: PML4 f4cb067 PGD 2d383067 PMD 0 Dec 18 03:18:09 data3 kernel: Oops: 0000 [1] SMP Dec 18 03:18:09 data3 kernel: CPU 2 Dec 18 03:18:09 data3 kernel: Modules linked in: md5 ipv6 i2c_dev i2c_core sunrpc dm_mod button battery ac uhci_hcd ehci_hcd e1000 ext3 jbd ata_pii...

Has anyone tried LFS (ie >2G files support) and Ext3 together? Are there good reasons why this should/should not work? I see the RH enterprise kernel patch set specifically does not attempt both lfs and ext3, but the lfs patches themselves touch some reasonably localised parts of ext2, so I would hope (without having dived in there to test), that the ext3 changes would mirror that

...interval 5 seconds Aug 9 17:57:31 boeaet34 kernel: EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.5, 30 Jul 2001 on md(9,0), internal journal Aug 9 17:57:31 boeaet34 kernel: EXT3-fs: recovery complete. Aug 9 17:57:31 boeaet34 kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Aug 9 17:57:39 boeaet34 kernel: <79): journal_dirty_metadata: journal_headion.c, 1069): journa(tra journal_head ion.c, 1069): journal_dirty_metadata: j 1de27ec0 Aug 9 17:57:39 boeaet34 kernel: irty_metadata: journal_head 1de27f20 Aug 9 17:57:39 boeaet34 kernel: <n.c, 1069): journal_dirty_m jou): journal_dirthead 1de27ec0 Aug 9 17:57:39 boeaet34 kernel:...

Hi, why is there a window between statements "err = ext3_journal_get_write_access(handle, this_bh);" and "ext3_journal_dirty_metadata(handle, this_bh);" ? In my test, there is an error in journal_dirty_metadata: jh is null thanks! D.Yang April 1, 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- /** * ext3_free_data - free a list of dat...

...ain NFS-server, running Debian Potato, died this morning whilst under quite heavy load - due to a runaway perl-script forking of some 200 instances of "/bin/cp" (the load was ~ 50). The server is running 2.2.19pre14 with ext3-0.0.6b. The server is running kernel-nfs. Assertion failure in journal_dirty_metadata() at transaction.c line 796: "bh->b_next_transaction == transaction" Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 current->tss.cr3 = 07ad0000, %cr3 = 07ad0000 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0002 CPU: 1 EIP: 0010:[<c0154731>] EFLAGS: 00010282 eax: 0...

Hello, we have a pair of IBM P570 servers running RHEL5.2 kernel 2.6.18-92.el5.ppc64 We have Oracle RAC on ocfs2 storage ocfs2 is 1.4.7-1 for the above kernel (downloaded from oracle oss site) Recently both servers have been crashing with the following error: Assertion failure in journal_dirty_metadata() at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1130: "handle->h_buffer_credits > 0" kernel BUG in journal_dirty_metadata at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1130! We get some kind of kernel debug prompt. the stack is as follows: .ocfs2_journal_dirty+0x78/0x13c [ocfs2] .ocfs2_search_chain+0x131c/0x165c [ocfs2] .o...

...tes Biases are: read/append=5, create/delete=5 Using Unix buffered file I/O Random number generator seed is 42 Report format is verbose. pm>run Creating files...Done Performing transactions.. Message from syslogd@server at Tue Jun 24 19:24:10 2003 ... server kernel: Assertion failure in journal_dirty_metadata() at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1073: "jh- >b_jlist != 1" Segmentation fault /var/log/messages= Jun 24 19:22:32 server kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with journal data mode. Jun 24 19:24:10 server kernel: Assertion failure in journal_dirty_metadata() at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1073:...

Hello. On a server running 2.4.25, I have the two following errors in the kernel logfile: Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Should I worry about them (disk failure, filesystem damage) ? Thanks. As an addition what does the pair '08:11' means ? Is

...0000078f c020f1c6 c43b92e0 cbf7bcc0 cbfb9600 Jun 29 11:30:05 ns kernel: c70c2340 c01595ec c43b92e0 cbf7bcc0 00000003 c6ca9c64 c238d8a8 c6ca9b40 Jun 29 11:30:05 ns kernel: 00000498 c015368f c70c2340 c3ad95a0 c47dbefc 00000000 c70c2340 00000498 Jun 29 11:30:05 ns kernel: Call Trace: [journal_dirty_metadata+324/356] [ext3_do_update_inode+763/920] [ext3_mark_iloc_dirty+33/72] [ext3_mark_inode_dirty+41/52] [ext3_dirty_inode+134/196] Jun 29 11:30:05 ns kernel: [__mark_inode_dirty+46/120] [generic_file_write+808/1864] [do_getitimer+156/164] [ext3_file_write+70/76] [sys_write+146/224] [system_call+51/5...

Hi all, ext3-0.0.5c is now up at: ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ The most important part of this release is the e2fsprogs: e2fsck now supports the journal changes for metadata-only journaling. Ted, I've changed around the use of jfs* include files in e2fsprogs quite heavily here. In each build directory --- the lib/ext2fs

...un/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_force_commit <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_dirty_data <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_force_commit_nested <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_init_dev <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_dirty_metadata <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_forget <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_wipe <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_blocks_per_page <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol journal_blocks_per_page <Jun/27 03:57 pm>ext3: Unknown symbol jou...

...s+245/288] [__mark_inode_dirty+46/144] [ext3_new_block+112/1936] [journal_cancel_revoke+251/368] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: Call Trace: [<c0152617>] [<c0158935>] [<c013e3ce>] [<c014d370>] [<c015ca9b>] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: [do_get_write_access+1183/1216] [journal_dirty_metadata+398/432] [ext3_do_update_inode+759/896] [ext3_do_update_inode+852/896] [ip_nat_fn+467/480] [ipt_hook+28/32] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: [<c015861f>] [<c0158c8e>] [<c0152117>] [<c0152174>] [<c02cfe53>] [<c02cfb2c>] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: [journal_cancel...

...s+245/288] [__mark_inode_dirty+46/144] [ext3_new_block+112/1936] [journal_cancel_revoke+251/368] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: Call Trace: [<c0152617>] [<c0158935>] [<c013e3ce>] [<c014d370>] [<c015ca9b>] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: [do_get_write_access+1183/1216] [journal_dirty_metadata+398/432] [ext3_do_update_inode+759/896] [ext3_do_update_inode+852/896] [ip_nat_fn+467/480] [ipt_hook+28/32] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: [<c015861f>] [<c0158c8e>] [<c0152117>] [<c0152174>] [<c02cfe53>] [<c02cfb2c>] Apr 17 21:40:13 mofo kernel: [journal_cancel...

Well.... you might remember that I have had problems will my NFS fileserver that run ext3 with data=journal. The filesystem corruption now seems too be solved with the patch (plus amendment) that I posted, so I am happy about that... but there is more. I have known for a while that ext3 doesn't behave very well when the journal fills up. If it finds that the journal is full, and the

...t;] [<c012f67a>] [<c012fb14>] > [<c01657e2>] > [<c013c807>] [<c0108be3>] > > > ksymoops gives me: > > Trace; c017565e <__jbd_unexpected_dirty_buffer+3a/74> > Trace; c016f76b <do_get_write_access+10f/570> > Trace; c01701dd <journal_dirty_metadata+15d/188> > Trace; c016fc10 <journal_get_write_access+44/68> > Trace; c0167c88 <do_journal_get_write_access+14/58> > Trace; c0167c4e <walk_page_buffers+52/78> > Trace; c0167e21 <ext3_prepare_write+155/208> > Trace; c0167c74 <do_journal_get_write_access+0/...

ocfs2 currently uses the Journaled Block Device (JBD) for its journaling. This is a very stable and tested codebase. However, JBD is limited by architecture to 32bit block numbers. This means an ocfs2 filesystem is limited to 2^32 blocks. With a 4K blocksize, that's 16TB. People want larger volumes. Fortunately, there is now JBD2. JBD2 adds 64bit block number support and some other