search for: jointh

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 14:05, Vikram Adve wrote: > I have been at Microsoft the last couple of days and so couldn't > jointhe discussion earlier. No worries. I knew you'd chime in sooner or later :) > Here's my view of the name issue, and (thereason this is long), a > little about how I think we want users to viewthis tool: > > First, I think the name should convey the purpose of the tool ... &gt...

I have been at Microsoft the last couple of days and so couldn't join the discussion earlier. Here's my view of the name issue, and (the reason this is long), a little about how I think we want users to view this tool: First, I think the name should convey the purpose of the tool -- otherwise, it just creates a confusing acronym (and goodness knows we have enough names already, even