search for: johnmark

Yes, it's true. I've been up late hacking on Gluster (and Puppet-Gluster)... While waiting for my code to compile, patch review (*cough*), and for JMW (aka johnmark) to take care of a few todo items, I realized I had never written an IRC bot!! Now I never aspired to be the bot master that JoeJulian is, but I figured I needed this notch on my hacker belt... Therefore, I'd like to introduce: JMWBot. (now with 20% more twisted!) JMWBot is the affectionate a...

It's that time again ? we want to test the GlusterFS 3.4 beta before we unleash it on the world. Like our last test fest, we want you to put the latest GlusterFS beta through real-world usage scenarios that will show you how it compares to previous releases. Unlike the last time, we want to focus this round of testing on Infiniband and RDMA hardware. For a description of how to do this, see

GlusterFS newbie (less than a week) here. Running GlusterFS 3.2.6 servers on Dell PE2900 systems with four 3.16 GHz Xeon cores and 16 GB memory under CentOS 5.8. For this test, I have a distributed volume of one brick only, so no replication. I have made performance measurements with both dd and Bonnie++, and they confirm each other; here I report only the dd numbers (using bs=1024k). File

This is a list of bugs that Vijay has tagged for the 3.3.0 beta3 milestone: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=Bugs%20targeted%20for%20GlusterFS%203.3.0%20beta3 Please take a look and see if any of them impact you. If so, feel free to add comments, and do please test fixes as they become available. You are, of course, welcome to submit patches as well,

Hey james and JMW: Can/Should we schedule a google hangout where james spins up a puppet-gluster based gluster deployment on fedora from scratch? Would love to see it in action (and possibly steal it for our own vagrant recipes). To speed this along: Assuming James is in England here , correct me if im wrong, but if so ~ Let me propose a date: Tuesday at 12 EST (thats 5 PM in london - which i

This error occurs because the "==" comparison operator doesn't allow comparison of ordered and normal factors: /df[df5$close_quarter == as.Date("2011-02-01"),]/ Warning message: In /`[.data.frame`(df, df$close_quarter == as.Date("2011-02-01")/, : Incompatible methods ("Ops.ordered", "Ops.Date") for "==" Why should this be a

Apologies, everyone. The mailing got stuck during the recent upgrade - and is now unstuck. Please report any further oddities to me or Eco at johnmark at johnmark.org or ewillson at redhat.com Thanks, JM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120926/241c168e/attachment.html>

RPM: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4.1qa2/ SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.4.1qa2.tar.gz This release is made off jenkins-release-42 -- Gluster Build System

It's a pity I don't know how to re-create the issue. While there are 1-2 crashed clients in total 120 clients every day. Below is gdb result: (gdb) where #0 0x0000003267432885 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x0000003267434065 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x000000326746f7a7 in __libc_message () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3 0x00000032674750c6 in malloc_printerr () from

I am not sure if posting with the subject copied from the webpage of mail-list of an existing thread would loop my response under the same. Apologies if it doesn't. I am trying to figure a way to mount a directory within a gluster volume to a web server. This directory is enabled with quota to limit a users' usage. gluster config: Volume Name: test-volume features.limit-usage:

Dear folks, I've been tried to use replicated stripped volumes with 3.3. unsuccessfully due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861423 and I then proceed to try 3.4.0qa5. I then find out that the bug was solved and I could use replicated stripped volume with the new version. Amazingly, write performance was quite astonishing. The problem I'm facing now is in the read process:

Hi, I've got Gluster error: Transport endpoint not connected. It came up twice after trying to rsync 2 TB filesystem over; it reached about 1.8 TB and got the error. Logs on the server side (on reverse time order): [2012-12-15 00:53:24.747934] I [server-helpers.c:629:server_connection_destroy] 0-RedhawkShared-server: destroyed connection of

Hi, since we switched to NFS(due to many small files) we are experiencing heavy problems with Glusters NFS daemon. About once a day, the Gluster NFS process just crashes on one of the machines and doesn't come up again until I issue a restart of the Gluster daemon on that node. Sometimes the crashed node will even crash again after the restart. We have a ~2TB volume with 6 bricks on 5

Hello Friends, Please give me the link, How can i download the gluster storage platform iso. And how can i get the graphical console of gluster. -- *Thanks and Regards.* *Vishvendra Singh Chauhan* *+91-8750625343* http:// <http://linux-links.blogspot.com>linux-links.blogspot.com God First Work Hard Success is Sure... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

This is a continuation of my previous posts about improving write perf when trapping millions of small writes to a gluster filesystem. I was able to improve write perf by ~30x by running STDOUT thru gzip to consolidate and reduce the output stream. Today, another similar problem, having to do with yet another bioinformatics program (which these days typically handle the 'short reads' that

Help please- I am running 3.3.1 on Centos using a 10GB network. I get reasonable write speeds, although I think they could be faster. But my read speeds are REALLY slow. Executive summary: On gluster client- Writes average about 700-800MB/s Reads average about 70-80MB/s On server- Writes average about 1-1.5GB/s Reads average about 2-3GB/s Any thoughts? Here are some additional details:

Hi Folks, I find myself trying to expand a 2-node high-availability cluster from to a 4-node cluster. I'm running Xen virtualization, and currently using DRBD to mirror data, and pacemaker to failover cleanly. The thing is, I'm trying to add 2 nodes to the cluster, and DRBD doesn't scale. Also, as a function of rackspace limits, and the hardware at hand, I can't separate

Greetings, As we approach the beta release for GlusterFS 3.4, I wanted to share how we're tracking issues that will be merged into 3.4, and which will be deferred to 3.5 or 3.4.1. Here is the wiki page where we're tracking this info: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/PatchPruning At the top is a link to a tracking bug in Bugzilla where we're tracking all

If you have been unable to join #gluster on Freenode, please comment here. I think we resolved the issue, but I want to make sure. -JM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130304/21a56f16/attachment.html>

RSVP for the July 23rd workshop: http://glusterday-pdx.eventbrite.com/ (there is a $25 deposit required) Full agenda and schedule will be posted by end of next week. Enjoy! Food and beverages will be served, with a follow-up happy hour. -JM